IBM contribution of its Cloud Computing Reference Architecture and references to CCMP
Dear OCCI-WG, An exercise of mapping of OCCI functionalities onto the proposed Common Cloud Management Platform (CCMP) features could be an interesting thing to do. I am not sure whether IBM is proposing CCMP as a ne standard, as a product, or just in the context of an architectural model; however, it seems well-enough described to compare with OCCI. Just a suggestion... Alan Begin forwarded message:
From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com> Date: February 28, 2011 5:45:12 PM CST To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> Subject: Re: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model Reply-To: "cc_refarch@nist.gov" <cc_refarch@nist.gov>
Today, IBM made a contribution of it's Cloud Computing Reference Architecture (CCRA) version 2.0 to The Open Group's (TOG) Cloud Computing Architecture Project.
Given that certain aspects of the evolving NIST RA were derived from an early version of IBM's CCRA (v1), there may be interest in our latest thinking.
The public contribution document can be downloaded from here: http://www.opengroup.org/cloudcomputing/documents.tpl?CALLER=index.tpl&dcat=15
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris IBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Industry and Cloud Standards Member, IBM Academy of Technology IBM Software Group, Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/chrisferris/ phone: +1 508 234 2986
-----cc_refarch@nist.gov wrote: ----- To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> From: "Bohn, Robert B." Sent by: cc_refarch@nist.gov Date: 02/28/2011 06:25PM Subject: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model
All:
I have included changes from today’s discussion. Please let me know if you think anything has been missed. I wish to send this to the Standards Working Group.
Thanks!
-b
[attachment "Strawman model v2.pdf" removed by Christopher B Ferris/ Waltham/IBM] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you would like to unsubscribe from cc_refarch, please send an email to listproc@nist.gov with a message body of: unsubscribe cc_refarch Please note: you must send the message from the account that you are subscribed. Begin forwarded message:
From: "Bohn, Robert B." <robert.bohn@nist.gov> Date: February 28, 2011 5:13:33 PM CST To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> Subject: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model Reply-To: "cc_refarch@nist.gov" <cc_refarch@nist.gov>
All:
I have included changes from today’s discussion. Please let me know if you think anything has been missed. I wish to send this to the Standards Working Group.
Thanks!
-b
Thanks for this Alan... On a cursory read through the referenced document and one of its predecessor [1], I see this more as a general architecture for cloud computing rather than a means to control/manage arbitrary cloud services (e.g. infrastructure services) through a standardised interface and protocol. From my POV, what is presented is but a generalised architecture and so there is little detail on what is known as the "Service Consumer Portal & API". It is to this particular component/entity where OCCI would be placed. So to your request, I would say that a) what's presented is an architectural model and b) it complements OCCI rather than something suitable for a *tête-à-tête* comparison. I've attached a diagram to show how the two complement each other (the diagram should be familiar - it's just the OCCI architectural overview adapted for this case [2]). HTH, Andy andy.edmonds.be [1] https://qp.research.ibm.com/LotusQuickr/sldemos/Main.nsf/0/6DFC3C4967F62E188... [2] http://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/occi-wg/trunk/figs/occi-intro.pdf On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:26, Alan Sill <Alan.Sill@ttu.edu> wrote:
Dear OCCI-WG,
An exercise of mapping of OCCI functionalities onto the proposed Common Cloud Management Platform (CCMP) features could be an interesting thing to do.
I am not sure whether IBM is proposing CCMP as a ne standard, as a product, or just in the context of an architectural model; however, it seems well-enough described to compare with OCCI.
Just a suggestion...
Alan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: February 28, 2011 5:45:12 PM CST To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> Subject: Re: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model Reply-To: "cc_refarch@nist.gov" <cc_refarch@nist.gov>
Today, IBM made a contribution of it's Cloud Computing Reference Architecture (CCRA) version 2.0 to The Open Group's (TOG) Cloud Computing Architecture Project.
Given that certain aspects of the evolving NIST RA were derived from an early version of IBM's CCRA (v1), there may be interest in our latest thinking.
The public contribution document can be downloaded from here:
http://www.opengroup.org/cloudcomputing/documents.tpl?CALLER=index.tpl&dcat=15
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris IBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Industry and Cloud Standards Member, IBM Academy of Technology IBM Software Group, Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/chrisferris/ phone: +1 508 234 2986
-----cc_refarch@nist.gov wrote: ----- To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> From: "Bohn, Robert B." Sent by: cc_refarch@nist.gov Date: 02/28/2011 06:25PM Subject: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model
All:
I have included changes from today’s discussion. Please let me know if you think anything has been missed. I wish to send this to the Standards Working Group.
Thanks!
-b
[attachment "Strawman model v2.pdf" removed by Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you would like to unsubscribe from cc_refarch, please send an email to listproc@nist.gov with a message body of: unsubscribe cc_refarch Please note: you must send the message from the account that you are subscribed.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Bohn, Robert B." <robert.bohn@nist.gov>
Date: February 28, 2011 5:13:33 PM CST To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> Subject: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model Reply-To: "cc_refarch@nist.gov" <cc_refarch@nist.gov>
All:
I have included changes from today’s discussion. Please let me know if you think anything has been missed. I wish to send this to the Standards Working Group.
Thanks!
-b
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
I guess the diagram might be useful too! Andy andy.edmonds.be On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 00:17, Andy Edmonds <andy@edmonds.be> wrote:
Thanks for this Alan... On a cursory read through the referenced document and one of its predecessor [1], I see this more as a general architecture for cloud computing rather than a means to control/manage arbitrary cloud services (e.g. infrastructure services) through a standardised interface and protocol. From my POV, what is presented is but a generalised architecture and so there is little detail on what is known as the "Service Consumer Portal & API". It is to this particular component/entity where OCCI would be placed.
So to your request, I would say that a) what's presented is an architectural model and b) it complements OCCI rather than something suitable for a *tête-à-tête* comparison. I've attached a diagram to show how the two complement each other (the diagram should be familiar - it's just the OCCI architectural overview adapted for this case [2]).
HTH,
Andy andy.edmonds.be
[1] https://qp.research.ibm.com/LotusQuickr/sldemos/Main.nsf/0/6DFC3C4967F62E188... [2] http://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/occi-wg/trunk/figs/occi-intro.pdf
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 19:26, Alan Sill <Alan.Sill@ttu.edu> wrote:
Dear OCCI-WG,
An exercise of mapping of OCCI functionalities onto the proposed Common Cloud Management Platform (CCMP) features could be an interesting thing to do.
I am not sure whether IBM is proposing CCMP as a ne standard, as a product, or just in the context of an architectural model; however, it seems well-enough described to compare with OCCI.
Just a suggestion...
Alan
Begin forwarded message:
From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: February 28, 2011 5:45:12 PM CST To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> Subject: Re: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model Reply-To: "cc_refarch@nist.gov" <cc_refarch@nist.gov>
Today, IBM made a contribution of it's Cloud Computing Reference Architecture (CCRA) version 2.0 to The Open Group's (TOG) Cloud Computing Architecture Project.
Given that certain aspects of the evolving NIST RA were derived from an early version of IBM's CCRA (v1), there may be interest in our latest thinking.
The public contribution document can be downloaded from here:
http://www.opengroup.org/cloudcomputing/documents.tpl?CALLER=index.tpl&dcat=15
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris IBM Distinguished Engineer, CTO Industry and Cloud Standards Member, IBM Academy of Technology IBM Software Group, Standards Strategy email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com blog: https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/chrisferris/ phone: +1 508 234 2986
-----cc_refarch@nist.gov wrote: ----- To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> From: "Bohn, Robert B." Sent by: cc_refarch@nist.gov Date: 02/28/2011 06:25PM Subject: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model
All:
I have included changes from today’s discussion. Please let me know if you think anything has been missed. I wish to send this to the Standards Working Group.
Thanks!
-b
[attachment "Strawman model v2.pdf" removed by Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ If you would like to unsubscribe from cc_refarch, please send an email to listproc@nist.gov with a message body of: unsubscribe cc_refarch Please note: you must send the message from the account that you are subscribed.
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Bohn, Robert B." <robert.bohn@nist.gov>
Date: February 28, 2011 5:13:33 PM CST To: Multiple recipients of list <cc_refarch@nist.gov> Subject: Latest Cloud Computing RA Conceptual Model Reply-To: "cc_refarch@nist.gov" <cc_refarch@nist.gov>
All:
I have included changes from today’s discussion. Please let me know if you think anything has been missed. I wish to send this to the Standards Working Group.
Thanks!
-b
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
participants (2)
-
Alan Sill -
Andy Edmonds