Anymore use cases which nede to be documented
Hi, Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document: http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/docman.r... (Except the financial grid use case...) Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-) The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc? Please reply until Tuesday next week... All the best, -Thijs -- Thijs Metsch Tel: +49 (0)941 3075-122 (x60122) http://blogs.sun.com/intheclouds Software Engineer Grid Computing Sun Microsystems GmbH Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 7 mailto:thijs.metsch@sun.com D-93049 Regensburg http://www.sun.com
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc. If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc. Let me know how I can help with editing, etc. Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/docman.r...
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- Michael Behrens R2AD, LLC (571) 594-3008 (cell) (703) 714-0442 (land)
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough. M. Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- M.
Hi, Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later! Cheers, -Thijs On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- Thijs Metsch Tel: +49 (0)941 3075-122 (x60122) http://blogs.sun.com/intheclouds Software Engineer Grid Computing Sun Microsystems GmbH Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 7 mailto:thijs.metsch@sun.com D-93049 Regensburg http://www.sun.com
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden). Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article> Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/ docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- M.
Thanks...Are you member of the gridforge project? If so you should be able to commit... -Thijs On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:34 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article>
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/ docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- Thijs Metsch Tel: +49 (0)941 3075-122 (x60122) http://blogs.sun.com/intheclouds Software Engineer Grid Computing Sun Microsystems GmbH Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 7 mailto:thijs.metsch@sun.com D-93049 Regensburg http://www.sun.com
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Thanks...Are you member of the gridforge project? If so you should be able to commit...
Well, yes I know; I'm a member of the project. The "svn co" command given worked, but this commit failed: [marcus@tuna:~/svn/occi/docs]$ svn ci --username marcus -m "Added Mutliple Allocation use-case" svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to MKACTIVITY request for '/svn/repos/occi/!svn/act/9c1b5eea-2bbd-412d- b19e-6b7e2ac80bf5' I reproduced this, by check out into a different dir, using svn checkout --username marcus http://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/occi and committing again, using the above command (with and without --username marcus). What to do? M.
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:34 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article>
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi -wg/ docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- M.
Hi Marcus, Can you try again for some reasons many people on the wiki have not been assigned the right roles/permissions. Might be an issue that 4 people approved membership with a outdated interface *g* -Thijs On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:31 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Thanks...Are you member of the gridforge project? If so you should be able to commit...
Well, yes I know; I'm a member of the project. The "svn co" command given worked, but this commit failed:
[marcus@tuna:~/svn/occi/docs]$ svn ci --username marcus -m "Added Mutliple Allocation use-case" svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to MKACTIVITY request for '/svn/repos/occi/!svn/act/9c1b5eea-2bbd-412d- b19e-6b7e2ac80bf5'
I reproduced this, by check out into a different dir, using svn checkout --username marcus http://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/occi and committing again, using the above command (with and without --username marcus).
What to do?
M.
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:34 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article>
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote: > Hi, > > Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the > document: > > http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi >-wg/ docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2 > > (Except the financial grid use case...) > > Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and > references to the sources need to be added - but this is just > the start :-) > > The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to > be added? Any which need to be refined etc? > > Please reply until Tuesday next week... > > All the best, > > -Thijs
-- Thijs Metsch Tel: +49 (0)941 3075-122 (x60122) http://blogs.sun.com/intheclouds Software Engineer Grid Computing Sun Microsystems GmbH Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 7 mailto:thijs.metsch@sun.com D-93049 Regensburg http://www.sun.com
I don't quite understand what the wiki involvement is, but now it worked ;-) M. Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi Marcus,
Can you try again for some reasons many people on the wiki have not been assigned the right roles/permissions. Might be an issue that 4 people approved membership with a outdated interface *g*
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:31 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Thanks...Are you member of the gridforge project? If so you should be able to commit...
Well, yes I know; I'm a member of the project. The "svn co" command given worked, but this commit failed:
[marcus@tuna:~/svn/occi/docs]$ svn ci --username marcus -m "Added Mutliple Allocation use-case" svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to MKACTIVITY request for '/svn/repos/occi/!svn/act/9c1b5eea-2bbd-412d- b19e-6b7e2ac80bf5'
I reproduced this, by check out into a different dir, using svn checkout --username marcus http://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/occi and committing again, using the above command (with and without --username marcus).
What to do?
M.
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:34 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article>
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
> I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support > the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. > Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was > to also provide for applying patches and updates to the > system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the > same interface for that as well as tasks, etc. > > If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc. > > Let me know how I can help with editing, etc. > > Thijs Metsch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the > > document: > > > > http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects. > >occi -wg/ docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2 > > > > (Except the financial grid use case...) > > > > Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and > > references to the sources need to be added - but this is > > just the start :-) > > > > The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need > > to be added? Any which need to be refined etc? > > > > Please reply until Tuesday next week... > > > > All the best, > > > > -Thijs
-- M.
Cool! Oh sorry...it is more about the general project membership settings of gridforge :-) Cheers, -Thijs On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:02 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I don't quite understand what the wiki involvement is, but now it worked ;-)
M.
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi Marcus,
Can you try again for some reasons many people on the wiki have not been assigned the right roles/permissions. Might be an issue that 4 people approved membership with a outdated interface *g*
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:31 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Thanks...Are you member of the gridforge project? If so you should be able to commit...
Well, yes I know; I'm a member of the project. The "svn co" command given worked, but this commit failed:
[marcus@tuna:~/svn/occi/docs]$ svn ci --username marcus -m "Added Mutliple Allocation use-case" svn: Commit failed (details follow): svn: Server sent unexpected return value (403 Forbidden) in response to MKACTIVITY request for '/svn/repos/occi/!svn/act/9c1b5eea-2bbd-412d- b19e-6b7e2ac80bf5'
I reproduced this, by check out into a different dir, using svn checkout --username marcus http://forge.ogf.org/svn/repos/occi and committing again, using the above command (with and without --username marcus).
What to do?
M.
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 11:34 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article>
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote: > I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've > added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if > this is enough. > > M. > > Quoting Michael Behrens > > > I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support > > the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. > > Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was > > to also provide for applying patches and updates to the > > system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the > > same interface for that as well as tasks, etc. > > > > If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc. > > > > Let me know how I can help with editing, etc. > > > > Thijs Metsch wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the > > > document: > > > > > > http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects. > > >occi -wg/ docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2 > > > > > > (Except the financial grid use case...) > > > > > > Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and > > > references to the sources need to be added - but this is > > > just the start :-) > > > > > > The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need > > > to be added? Any which need to be refined etc? > > > > > > Please reply until Tuesday next week... > > > > > > All the best, > > > > > > -Thijs
-- Thijs Metsch Tel: +49 (0)941 3075-122 (x60122) http://blogs.sun.com/intheclouds Software Engineer Grid Computing Sun Microsystems GmbH Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 7 mailto:thijs.metsch@sun.com D-93049 Regensburg http://www.sun.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Marcus Hardt <marcus@hardt-it.de> wrote:
I don't quite understand what the wiki involvement is, but now it worked ;-)
Per OGF policy we use a [dated] installation of SourceForge for our development work - if nothing else this ensures that IPR's are always satisfied. We have the occasional problem (like this) but it's generally fairly reliable. Sam
Just wondering - is this the same as or different from tagging? On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Marcus Hardt <marcus@hardt-it.de> wrote:
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article>
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/
docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- M.
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
Guessing the requirements would not be but the reqs. are then backed up by two use cases --> nice :-D Cheers, -Thijs On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 12:37 +0300, shlomo.swidler@gmail.com wrote:
+ <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para>
-- Thijs Metsch Tel: +49 (0)941 3075-122 (x60122) http://blogs.sun.com/intheclouds Software Engineer Grid Computing Sun Microsystems GmbH Dr.-Leo-Ritter-Str. 7 mailto:thijs.metsch@sun.com D-93049 Regensburg http://www.sun.com
Unfortunately [this version of] SourceForge apparently doesn't support anonymous repositories, so if you can check out you should be able to check in... we'll likely need help from OGF if this is not the case. Sam On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Marcus Hardt <marcus@hardt-it.de> wrote:
Hi, I tried to edit, but SVN didn't accpt my commit (403: Forbidden).
Here's it as a patch. Index: occi-usecases.xml =================================================================== --- occi-usecases.xml (revision 51) +++ occi-usecases.xml (working copy) @@ -699,4 +699,30 @@ </listitem> </itemizedlist> </section> + <section> + <title>Multiple Allocation</title> + <para>Allocate a whole cluster with one call.</para> + + <bridgehead>Functional Requirements</bridgehead> + + <itemizedlist> + <listitem> + <para>Definition of groups: There should be a way to define groups + of computers. In the example of a cluster, there would be two + groups: The Headnode and a couple of Workernodes.</para> + </listitem> + + <listitem> + <para>Information: For configuration of the members of the defined + groups, there should be way (maybe a URL) to find out about + all groups and their basic configurations. In the example, the + Headnode would want to know IPs or Hostnames of all + Workernodes. The workernodes will need to know this, as well + _and_ they need to know, that the headnode is in a different + group. </para> + </listitem> + + </itemizedlist> + </section> + </article>
Quoting Thijs Metsch
Hi,
Thanks for the contribution! - You can add it to the document yourself if you want , otherwise I'll do that later!
Cheers,
-Thijs
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 10:41 +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
I've added the use case of allocating multiple machines. I've added it only to the wiki, not to any document and I wonder if this is enough.
M.
Quoting Michael Behrens
I' added a compute/task use case could that would also support the installation of patches. Let me know if that's okay. Attached is a PDF of the content as well. A main driver was to also provide for applying patches and updates to the system. I think it makes some sense to be able to use the same interface for that as well as tasks, etc.
If it is not applicable at this time, it can be excluded, etc.
Let me know how I can help with editing, etc.
Thijs Metsch wrote:
Hi,
Today I moved all the use cases we had in the wiki to the document:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/docman/do/downloadDocument/projects.occi-wg/
docm an.root.drafts/doc15732/2
(Except the financial grid use case...)
Those descriptions still need be refined in the wording and references to the sources need to be added - but this is just the start :-)
The question is now: are there anymore use cases which need to be added? Any which need to be refined etc?
Please reply until Tuesday next week...
All the best,
-Thijs
-- M.
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
participants (6)
-
Marcus Hardt -
Marcus Hardt -
Michael Behrens -
Sam Johnston -
shlomo.swidler＠gmail.com -
Thijs Metsch