Hi, Please find attached the updated JSON document with a, IMO, more consistent description of the format used to invoke an OCCI Action. Just to clarify, this refers to OCCI Actions as defined in the Core Model. The HTTP operations GET/POST/PUT/DELETE are _not_ OCCI Actions. OO: While an OCCI Kind identifies "class" an OCCI Action identifies a "method" found in a class. regards, Ralf On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:48:13 +0200, Ralf Nyren <ralf@nyren.net> wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:02:37 +0000, "Feldhaus, Florian" <florian.feldhaus@gwdg.de> wrote:
* changed name of OCCI Action to OCCI Action Instance. The Action instance format is now closer to the text rendering of action instantiations
With the Core errata changes OCCI Action is only an identifier of the invocable operation. It does not represent the operation itself.
An OCCI Action instance is basically just a Category with a different class name. And being a type identifier it cannot contain e.g. attribute values.
I would therefore propose to call this "Action _invocation_ format" instead. I have uploaded a commit implementing this change to the json branch. The commit only touches this issue and should be easy to back out if not desired.
regards, Ralf