29 Oct
2009
29 Oct
'09
2:56 p.m.
Sure, libvirt makes sense if you were 'not' writing to an occi data model. gary eprparadocs@gmail.com wrote:
That makes sense. Thanks.
Chaz.
Sam Johnston wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:10 PM, <eprparadocs@gmail.com <mailto:eprparadocs@gmail.com>> wrote:
Why not just use libvirt? It is already there, controls all VM systems and has all the requisite parts.
That's not a bad idea, but is it not a lower level API dealing with virtualisation directly? For example products like Enomaly use it to control the hypvervisor on the host but then are also candidates for exposing an OCCI API for remote clients.
Sam
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg