The diagram looks good & reads well to me.
Thanks.
Ralf Nyren wrote:
Michael,
Please find attached a version of the core model with Kind split
into
two separate classes. Was it something like this you were
looking for?
To me it makes sense to do the split. Before we had the
abstraction
between Category and Kind it was tempting to stuff all
functionality
into the Category. I do not think it is anymore.
I think this, exactly as you say Michael, definitely help clear
things
up a bit :)
If there are any objections I need them asap, if this is going
in I
need to start updating the core doc tomorrow. And if anyone has
a
better name than "Mixin" please speak up!
regards, Ralf
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 05:35:34 +0100, Michael Behrens
<michael.behrens@r2ad.com>
wrote:
I see that the core UML model has been
updated, interesting changes. The name
changes look okay to me (Entity, Kind).
2-cents: Structural and Non-Structural concept might be
confusing to
folks
reading it the first time through. Perhaps its purpose
(extensibility)
could be
stated before their definitions in a non normative manner.
Lastly,
would adding
two subclass of kind (structured/unstructured) help clear
things a bit?
(The
text seems to speak as if there are two subclasses).
--
Michael Behrens
R2AD, LLC
(571) 594-3008 (cell)
(703) 714-0442 (land)
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg