It'd be great if we had something like this -  I've comments, both my own and comments extracted from the mailing list, that need to be integrated in the context of the specification's content. I don't see any elegant way that DocBook supports this other than an obvious text insertion.

Andy
andy.edmonds.be


On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 17:26, Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro@gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks, comment will follow today.

Does anyone know how to add line numbers to the docs for editing and
commenting purposes ?

I'm not sure but it is something I've thought about. There was a great web annotation system for GPLv3 called stet but it's now dead and they recommend co-ment.net instead (which barfed on the DocBook I fed it). Marginalia looks pretty cool too but what would be amazing is a system like the one we're using for the HTML 5 Working Drafts which posts directly to BugZilla.

Sam

Thijs Metsch wrote:
> a new version is available via occi-wg.org or the link below...
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Thijs
>
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 16:14 +0200, Thijs Metsch wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to encourage you all to have a look at our first
>> deliverable 'Requirements and Use Cases for a Cloud API'. I would ask to
>> send you comments, ideas and thoughts by Friday. The document can be
>> found here:
>>
>> http://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc15732
>>
>> Friday is not a 'real' deadline. But I will submit it into the OGF
>> editor pipeline on Friday. Then it will go into a public review - after
>> that it will be released as our first informal document.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> -Thijs
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg


_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg