It'd be great if we had something like this - I've comments, both my own and comments extracted from the mailing list, that need to be integrated in the context of the specification's content. I don't see any elegant way that DocBook supports this other than an obvious text insertion.
Andy
andy.edmonds.be
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro@gmail.com> wrote:Thanks, comment will follow today.
Does anyone know how to add line numbers to the docs for editing and
commenting purposes ?I'm not sure but it is something I've thought about. There was a great web annotation system for GPLv3 called stet but it's now dead and they recommend co-ment.net instead (which barfed on the DocBook I fed it). Marginalia looks pretty cool too but what would be amazing is a system like the one we're using for the HTML 5 Working Drafts which posts directly to BugZilla.SamThijs Metsch wrote:
> a new version is available via occi-wg.org or the link below...
>
> Cheers,
>
> -Thijs
>
> On Mon, 2009-09-07 at 16:14 +0200, Thijs Metsch wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to encourage you all to have a look at our first
>> deliverable 'Requirements and Use Cases for a Cloud API'. I would ask to
>> send you comments, ideas and thoughts by Friday. The document can be
>> found here:
>>
>> http://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc15732
>>
>> Friday is not a 'real' deadline. But I will submit it into the OGF
>> editor pipeline on Friday. Then it will go into a public review - after
>> that it will be released as our first informal document.
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> -Thijs
>>
>>
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg