On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Christopher Smith <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:csmith@platform.com">csmith@platform.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">




<div>
<font face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size:9pt">Just as a procedural aside from copyright/license issues....<br>
<br>
If you have very substantive changes to the document that has been through public comment already, do you realize another 60 day comment period might be necessary (i.e. if the changes aren’t just for addressing the current set of public comments)?</span></font></div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes, so be it. At least this time round we will have a feature complete draft so subsequent changes should be cosmetic (which is to say people can fairly safely start implementing). From an openness point of view it&#39;s hard to criticise having not one but TWO rounds of public comments :)</div>
<div><br></div><div>Sam</div><div><br></div></div><br>