Re: [occi-wg] OCCI Core ready for public comment version

Autobot or Decepticon? I like the new structure, and also the naming, btw... -Alexander Am 09.11.2010 um 08:25 schrieb Alexis Richardson:

It also looks remarkably like a Transformer...

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Michael Behrens wrote: The diagram looks good & reads well to me. Thanks.

Ralf Nyren wrote:

...

Michael,

Please find attached a version of the core model with Kind split into two separate classes. Was it something like this you were looking for?

To me it makes sense to do the split. Before we had the abstraction between Category and Kind it was tempting to stuff all functionality into the Category. I do not think it is anymore.

I think this, exactly as you say Michael, definitely help clear things up a bit :)

If there are any objections I need them asap, if this is going in I need to start updating the core doc tomorrow. And if anyone has a better name than "Mixin" please speak up!

regards, Ralf

On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 05:35:34 +0100, Michael Behrens wrote:

...

I see that the core UML model has been updated, interesting changes. The name changes look okay to me (Entity, Kind).

2-cents: Structural and Non-Structural concept might be confusing to folks reading it the first time through. Perhaps its purpose (extensibility) could be stated before their definitions in a non normative manner. Lastly, would adding two subclass of kind (structured/unstructured) help clear things a bit? (The text seems to speak as if there are two subclasses).

core_model.png

-- Michael Behrens R2AD, LLC (571) 594-3008 (cell) (703) 714-0442 (land)

_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg