On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:16 AM,  <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:shlomo.swidler@gmail.com">shlomo.swidler@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">&gt; Don&#39;t get me wrong - testing is important, just not today while we&#39;re trying<br>
&gt; to get a[n overdue] draft out the door. Correct functioning against a<br>
&gt; reference implementation would be a good start.<br>
<br>
</div>Sam, thanks for clarifying the process.<br>
<br>
I didn&#39;t mean to imply that we need to work on compliance tests now,<br>
I&#39;m just wondering if this is a deliverable we will provide at some<br>
point, and whether or not it will be available &quot;in time&quot; to help spec<br>
implementors.</blockquote></div><br>It would definitely be nice to have, and the reference implementation we have today is for the server side interface (that is, only useful for testing clients). It&#39;s not on our official list of deliverables though - I&#39;m fairly confident the interop problems will be with the data interchange format(s), as is the case today (OVF isn&#39;t really working as intended just yet).<br>
<br>Thanks for the feedback - do you have any thoughts about the interface itself?<br><br>Sam<br><br>