I'd vote for keeping "Link". Core should be clean, and not tailored to some naming in the renderings. I know that, for HTTP, certain things are fix, but I don't see such a danger for confusions, anyway. -Alexander Am 06.10.2010 um 16:33 schrieb Ralf Nyren:
Hi,
It is easy to confuse the OCCI "Link" base type with HTTP "Link Header" and the general term of linking.
Therefore it was proposed during today's conf call to rename the base type "Link" to "ResourceLink". That way we let the name make clear what the Link is used for, i.e. linking Resources.
Would appreciate your comments. Deadline is on Friday.
regards, Ralf
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg