> So, what this discussion basically boils down to is, that
> this group should do two steps:
>
> A) define the nouns and verbs for the API, and nail down
> semantics for them
>
> B) do different bindings for the result of (A)
>
> Looks sensible (to me), and there seem to be enough people
> around who can check the process in (A) for implementability
> in the various options of (B).
I certainly think this is a good plan. I split my original posting into
these two halves for exactly this reason!