Yup keep it as&nbsp;simple and constrained as possible, no point turning it into Otanic.<br><br><font face=Arial><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial"><span style="FONT-FAMILY: Arial">Regards,<br>Kristoffer Sheather</span><br></span></span></span></span></span></font><br><font face="Tahoma, Arial, Sans-Serif" size=2>
<hr align=center width="100%" SIZE=2>
<b>From</b>: Randy Bias &lt;randyb@gogrid.com&gt;<br><b>Sent</b>: Thursday, 7 May 2009 8:28 AM<br><b>To</b>: Sam Johnston &lt;samj@samj.net&gt;, "occi-wg@ogf.org" &lt;occi-wg@ogf.org&gt;<br><b>Subject</b>: Re: [occi-wg] Is OCCI the HTTP of Cloud Computing?</font><br><br><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt">Amen on this one. &nbsp;Small and constrained. &nbsp;Plus use cases. &nbsp;That's it.<br><br><br>--Randy<br><br><br>On 5/6/09 7:04 AM, "Sam Johnston" &lt;<a href="samj@samj.net">samj@samj.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br></span></font>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt">In general, the more focused and narrow a modeling effort is, the more successful it seems to be (with OVF as the most focused of the list and CML as the other extreme).<br></span></font></blockquote></blockquote><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="FONT-SIZE: 11pt"><br><br>-- <br>Randy Bias, VP Technology Strategy, GoGrid<br><a href="randyb@gogrid.com">randyb@gogrid.com</a>, (415) 939-8507 [mobile]<br>BLOG: <a href="http://neotactics.com/blog">http://neotactics.com/blog</a>, TWITTER: twitter.com/randybias<br></span></font><br>