Further to Andrew's comments, I've thus far tried to avoid fixed schemas for anything, preferring tags and attributes and deferring a lot of that detail to supporting standards like OVF. I don't see a problem with using GLUE as an "alternate" representation and/or linking to it using <link>s or an extension. I hope that answers your question... basically I suggest that we [re]use it if we need to but not before. Sam On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Edmonds, AndrewX <andrewx.edmonds@intel.com
wrote:
Hey Andre - we reviewed GLUE in SLA@SOI to see if it would meet our needs for infrastructure provisioning but for the most our initial feelings are that it wouldn't suit. Would you have any other viewpoint on this?
Andy
<snip/>
But anyway: do you expect GLUE to play any role in respect to the specification of (VM) resource requirements?
<snip/> ------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Ireland Limited (Branch) Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland Registered Number: E902934
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.