Re: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?

17 May 2010

      Hi Gyula,

The XML versions of OCCI were developed prior to the XHTML5/RDFa 
discussions. I believe Andy's version was for the SLA@SOI project which 
uses XML. My version is being used as a staged prototype to help move 
toward the RDFa implementation. Since XHTML5/RDFa is a format similar 
enough to POX, the transition to and future adoption should be no more 
difficult than adopting pox.

I hope this explains why there are XML formats floating around. I can't 
speak for the SLA@SOI project, but as soon as the XHTML5/RDFa is 
completed, I will be abandoning my XML implementation.

cheers,
gary

Sam Johnston wrote:
...
2010/5/17 Csom Gyula <csom@interface.hu <mailto:csom@interface.hu>>
Hi,
    when rereading your reply one more question came up. You wrote:
> Andy (Edmonds) and Gary (Mazzaferro) are working on this
    > topic. Especially with an eye on RDFa and XHTML5
Does that mean there won't be pure XML format, XSD scheme?
    I'm asking this because both Andy and Gary posted XSD schemes
    to the mailing list. I'm a bit confused... Could you please
    clarify this?
That's right, there are no plans for a POX (plain old XML) rendering 
at this time.
Sam
-----Eredeti üzenet-----
    Feladó: Thijs Metsch [mailto:tmetsch@platform.com
    <mailto:tmetsch@platform.com>]
    Küldve: 2010. 05. 15., Szo 12:56
    Címzett: Csom Gyula; occi-wg@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org>
    Tárgy: RE: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
Hi,
That makes life easier :-) As you know we are working on the
    rendering topic and you suggestions are more than welcome!
Cheers,
-Thijs
> -----Original Message-----
    > From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org>
    [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org>] On
    > Behalf Of Csom Gyula
    > Sent: Samstag, 15. Mai 2010 12:51
    > To: occi-wg@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org>
    > Subject: Re: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
    >
    > Hi,
    > thx for your reply!
    >
    > I forgot to mention in my previous mail, that our development
    would end
    > at the end of this summer (when the deployment phase would start).
    > Though we do not have a detailed plan, yet, I guess cluster specific
    > development wouldn't start before july, so we have at least 1-1,5
    > month before (detailed) design decisions must be made...
    >
    > Let me add one more thing regarding the upcoming scheme. In order to
    > be extensible it would be nice to support any or anyAttribute
    element
    > within the scheme. At least for the Category element this could be
    > necessary for compatibility reasons, eg. according to the http
    category
    > header draft, category already supports extensions
    > (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-johnston-http-category-header-00,
    > Section 3).
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Gyula
    >
    > -----Eredeti üzenet-----
    > Feladó: Thijs Metsch [mailto:tmetsch@platform.com
    <mailto:tmetsch@platform.com>]
    > Küldve: 2010. 05. 15., Szo 12:18
    > Címzett: Csom Gyula; occi-wg@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org>
    > Másolatot kap: Andy Edmonds; garymazzaferro@gmail.com
    <mailto:garymazzaferro@gmail.com>
    > Tárgy: RE: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
    >
    >
    > Hi,
    >
    > Right now Andy (Edmonds) and Gary (Mazzaferro) are working on this
    > topic. Especially with an eye on RDFa and XHTML5. I doubt that there
    > will be something ready within the next 2 weeks, since both are
    pretty
    > busy right now.
    >
    > Cheers,
    >
    > -Thijs
    >
    > > -----Original Message-----
    > > From: occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org>
    [mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg-bounces@ogf.org>] On
    > > Behalf Of Csom Gyula
    > > Sent: Samstag, 15. Mai 2010 11:17
    > > To: occi-wg@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org>
    > > Subject: [occi-wg] OCCI XML scheme status?
    > >
    > > Hi,
    > > when can we expect the final draft version of the occi xml
    scheme to
    > be
    > > published?
    > >
    > > We are backed by OpenNebula which uses XML as rendering format.
    > > Meanwhile we have
    > > to extend it's capabilities in order to support clusters (see my
    > > previus mail:
    > > "Cluster kind or such", where I was adviced to use
    Categories). Since
    > > we want to adhere
    > > to the standard it's important for us to know whether your xml
    spec
    > > time is within our
    > > development timeframe or not:)
    > >
    > > I've seen Gary Mazzaferro already posted the first draft
    version of
    > the
    > > occi xml scheme
    > > at March
    > (http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/occi-wg/2010-March/001682.html).
    > > I have one
    > > question in this regard. Do you plan to support links and
    categories
    > in
    > > the scheme?
    > >
    > > Cheers,
    > > Gyula
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > occi-wg mailing list
    > > occi-wg@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org>
    > > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > occi-wg mailing list
    > occi-wg@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org>
    > http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________
    occi-wg mailing list
    occi-wg@ogf.org <mailto:occi-wg@ogf.org>
    http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg