Hi Andre,

Thanks..

I did find the reference to it in one of your emails from 2 years ago..Minor comments:

- why the purl.org/occi namespace? OGF has an established
namespace for XML schemata, see http://schemas.ogf.org/,
and GFD.84 on http://www.ogf.org/docs/?cp

cheers
gary



On 4/5/2011 11:46 PM, Andre Merzky wrote:
Hi Gary,

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Gary Mazz <garymazzaferro@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi All,

Maybe I wasn't clear with the question. I thought we generated a scheme
and published it on http://schemas.ogf.org . It been almost a year ago,
so I may be wrong... or dropped another brain cell along the way :)
>From what I understand from the OCCI specs, the schema locations are
indeed supposed to provide a unique and well defined namespace for
OCCI, and OCCI extensions.  But I don't see any place in the specs
where that URL is actually evaluated, and returns a schema of any
kind.

Having said that, I think it might be a good idea to use that schema
scheme (ha!) to implement some form of namespace verification.  For
example, I placed an empty document at
http://schemas.ogf.org/occi/infrastructure, so that all GET operations
on that document return an HTTP 200 (OK).  That provides a very simple
way to confirm the validity of OCCI identifiers, and also provides a
straight-forward way to register OCCI extensions (or rather, their
namespaces).  One could also link the normative documents for the
extension at http://schemas.ogf.org/occi/infrastructure#specification;
one could verify the #target elements; etc.  However, that is as of
yet unspecified AFAICS, and is likely a rather naive proposal, given
my somewhat limited knowledge of HTTP itself.

Best, Andre.


cheers,
gary



On 4/5/2011 10:34 PM, Alan Sill wrote:
(Same question in the core document , with regards to the http://schemas.ogf.org/occi/ base URL reserved for OCCI and the http://schemas.ogf.org/occi/core#entity Kind instances.)

Sorry for the ignorant question.

Alan

On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Sill, Alan wrote:

More specifically - in Table 1 we define the following Kind instances.  Are these tken to be a namespace, so that no definite schema has to be associated with them, or is there intended to be a document returned at the following URIs (i.e., are they actual schemata URLs)?


Table 1.     The Kind instances defined for the infrastructure sub-types of Resource, Link and related Mixins. The base URL http://schemas.ogf.org/occi has been replaced with<schema>  in this table for a better readability experience.

Term
compute storage storagelink network ipnetworking networkinterface ipnetworkinterface

Scheme
<schema>/infrastructure#<schema>/infrastructure#<schema>/infrastructure#<schema>/infrastructure#<schema>/infrastructure/network#<schema>/infrastructure#<schema>/infrastucture/networkinterface#

Title
Compute Resource Storage Resource StorageLink Link Network Resource IP Networking Mixin NetworkInterface Link IP NetworkInterface Mixin
Related Kind

<schema>/core#resource<schema>/core#resource<schema>/core#link<schema>/core#resource –
<schema>/core#link –

Thanks,
Alan

On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Sill, Alan wrote:

See Section 3.2 and e.g. Table 3 of the current Infrastructure document.

Alan



On Apr 5, 2011, at 12:21 PM, "alexander.papaspyrou@tu-dortmund.de"<alexander.papaspyrou@tu-dortmund.de>  wrote:

Hm, not sure what schema you mean...

What would you expect to see there?

-Alexander

Am 05.04.2011 um 01:36 schrieb Gary Mazz:

Hi Alan,

Where can Joel get the definitive current schema or schemata belonging to OCCI ?

That's my question.. :)

-gary



On 4/4/2011 4:45 PM, Sill, Alan wrote:
Usually these are created when the document s published. We ran into this on another recent document now in public comment also, and decided to put it in on a tentative basis in that case to facilitate testing. We can do that this time also, since things are so close to publication.

Where can Joel get the definitive current schema or schemata belonging to OCCI, and how likely is it / are they to change before final publication?

Alan



On Apr 4, 2011, at 5:24 PM, "Gary Mazz"<garymazzaferro@gmail.com>   wrote:

Hi

There is no scheme @ http://schemas.ogf.org/occi/

cheers,
gary


_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg

_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg