+1 core -g On 10/7/2010 4:41 AM, Ralf Nyren wrote:
I'd vote for Core as well. With the specifics in the renderings of course.
regards, Ralf
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:01:36 +0200, Andy Edmonds<andy.edmonds@gmail.com> wrote:
I'd like to see it in core to enforce interop.
Andy
On 7 Oct 2010, at 09:41, "alexander.papaspyrou@tu-dortmund.de" <alexander.papaspyrou@tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
Shall we leverage the versioning issue to core or leave it to the renderings?
-Alexander
Am 07.10.2010 um 05:16 schrieb Michael Behrens:
Looks good. I did notice the change that the client MUST now provide a version, whereas before it was optional with an assumption that the latest version is implied. Either way is okay, just wanted to make sure. - Michael
Edmonds, AndrewX wrote:
Hai all,
I've added a small wiki page (probably will be absorbed elsewhere) on getting versioning information related to the API. You can find it here:
http://forge.ogf.org/sf/wiki/do/viewPage/projects.occi-wg/wiki/Versioning
Comments as ever are healthy and welcomed! :-)
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------- Intel Ireland Limited (Branch) Collinstown Industrial Park, Leixlip, County Kildare, Ireland Registered Number: E902934
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
<ATT00001..txt>
occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg