Playing catch up on this big thread today. Trying selectively respond given how much there is here to dig through. Regarding this particular issue below (handling VM sizing requests) I also vote for the provider kicking back an error for unsupported sizes rather than rounding¹. It will be easy enough for folks to have templates for different providers or to provide some kind of optional templating within the spec that providers can surface in a machine consumable way. --Randy On 4/16/09 5:01 AM, "Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> wrote:
If the provider has templates these should be advertised but ultimately it's up to the implementor to decide whether to reject a request for an unsupported configuration with an error or whether to satisfy it anyway with a larger device.
-- Randy Bias, VP Technology Strategy, GoGrid randyb@gogrid.com, (415) 939-8507 [mobile] BLOG: http://neotactics.com/blog, TWITTER: twitter.com/randybias