On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Alexis Richardson <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:alexis.richardson@gmail.com">alexis.richardson@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Interesting point.<br>
<br>
Speaking as someone who is professionally involved in messaging and<br>
events my STRONG advice would be to completely leave them for now.<br>
Implementation of the planned draft will naturally bring up use cases<br>
suited to the various eventing technologies and protocols, none of<br>
which are fully baked by the way.  This will be good fodder for future<br>
work but currently is **** not in scope ****.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Agreed, and I don&#39;t know AMQP well enough to say how it could fit here.<br><br>The use case we need to take away from it is that OCCI messages aren&#39;t necessarily going to be ephemeral - they may well be long lived, queued, serialised, saved to file, etc.<br>
<br>Sam<br><br></div></div>