16 Apr
2009
16 Apr
'09
7:41 p.m.
Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net> writes:
So, what this discussion basically boils down to is, that this group should do two steps:
A) define the nouns and verbs for the API, and nail down semantics for them
B) do different bindings for the result of (A)
Looks sensible (to me), and there seem to be enough people around who can check the process in (A) for implementability in the various options of (B).
I certainly think this is a good plan. I split my original posting into these two halves for exactly this reason! Cheers, Chris.