+1 google docs. I like the ability to collaborate on-line. We can always convert later to another format if needed. Alexis Richardson wrote:
+1 for google docs.
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Andre Merzky
wrote: Quoting [Thijs Metsch] (Jul 01 2010):
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 03:37:22 -0400 From: "Thijs Metsch"
To: Subject: [occi-wg] Editorial tool Hi @all,
Since DocBook hasn't turned out to be the best tool for editing our specs I wanted to bring up the discussion on how the following revision should be edited. I guess we have several options - and feel free to add more:
* Word/OpenOffice Pro: Ease of use (Templates available) Contra: Merging and version control
* Latex Pro: Merging, version control easy (Andre could help with templates) Contra: Not so easy to use
* Plain TXT files in Wiki --> then use a tool for formatting when finished... Pro: Easy editable Contra: Not so cool for graphics etc. (formatting)
Google docs is another option I guess, although you cannot use the GF accounts that way.
Best, Andre.
Feel free to add more and state you preference - It would be cool if in future a lot of people can help edit the specs.
Cheers,
-Thijs
-- Nothing is ever easy. _______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
_______________________________________________ occi-wg mailing list occi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
-- Michael Behrens R2AD, LLC (571) 594-3008 (cell) (703) 714-0442 (land)