Thank you for posting this for review. It's very interesting. In case I can't call into the meeting, here are a few comments/thoughts from the initial sections:
- I like the phase workflow (Discovery, Negotiation, Execution, Monitoring). Nice.
- Having a ReSTful implementation based on OCCI seems very workable, based on what you've written.
- Compliance test: It occurred to me that instead of a boolean, or rather in addition to a boolean, there might be a need for a percentage of compliance.
- Not sure I understand what occurs when a server redirects to counter offer - does this mean the server would respond with a 3xx http code? Sounds interesting.

Minor nit-noid: "counter over" -> "counter offer"

Augusto Ciuffoletti wrote:

Hi all,

in attachment is the result of my work with the Service Level Agreement doc.

In essence, the starting document was a sparse collection of comments, ideas, examples around a seminal paper. The material was valuable, but not necessarily consistent and definitely incomplete. My first step with it has been to put in a row ideas and examples, and to fill a few wide gaps. Inconsistencies are still there, and represent alternative views.

The document is a pdf from a LaTeX source: at this stage I think that collaboration should mainly consist of comments on the paper, and addenda/corrections. This can be done with pdf editing tools (for instance "flpsed" for linux users, pls use tags) to add comments, or email attachments.

The paper is going to be briefly presented during tomorrow's call.

Augusto Ciuffoletti

2012/7/24 Edmonds Andrew (edmo) <edmo@zhaw.ch>

Attendees: Gary, Thijs, Mike, Augusto, Eugene, Andy

Topic of SLA & Monitoring document was discussed. Augusto will have a 'sanitised' version for review at next weeks meeting. Thanks!

Gary noted that there is no guidance on attribute naming. He volunteered to write up what should be. Shall be distributed via mailing list and again reviewed at next weeks confcall. Thanks!

All other agreed that they would read and have comments ready on both SLA & monitoring and attribute naming contributions. Thanks!

Mike brought up the topic of standardisation and PaaS. He suggested that this be discussed at next week's confcall and that it would be very useful if a representative of CompatibleOne be present.

No aspect of the JSON rendering document was discussed.

Agenda Next Week:
- SLA & Monitoring review
- Attribute naming review
- PaaS discussion

Thijs re-iterated that people should not be looking at the old SVN facilities but rather those hosted on the new redmine facilities.

Cheers!

Andy

Andy Edmonds
Senior Researcher
Institute of Information Technology
Zürich University of Applied Sciences
http://andy.edmonds.be, @dizz
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg

--
Augusto Ciuffoletti
Dipartimento di Informatica
Università di Pisa
56100 - Pisa (Italy)
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg