On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote:
On 14 May 2009, at 12:24, Sam Johnston wrote:

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Roger Menday <roger.menday@uk.fujitsu.com> wrote:

On 14 May 2009, at 10:59, Alexis Richardson wrote:

+1 to Sam's "we may need to revisit this point in the name of interop"

I'm not sure if this is *just* an interop thing ...

I thought my suggestions yesterday on how to transition state, error reporting, handling 'processing' states, etc ... were reasonable.

Kind of disappointed this morning that I didn't get some feedback from you guys ... :(

Roger, I was working on OCCI until 5am this morning and while this is by far the most interesting part of the work it's only half of the problem. The other half, adoption/marketing, is boring grunt work that keeps us organisers very much on our toes, preventing us from being responsive at times.

Hi Sam, 

I really wasn't questioning your commitment !
 
I'm interested in learning/participating/influencing - why I was hopeful for a reply. 

My point is just that it's not always possible to address every point immediately. On this one I tend to agree with Alexis - implementation will iron out the little wrinkles provided we take care of the big ones.

Sam