I would imagine that achieving consensus on various issues related to the OCCI spec should be one of the important things for the OCCI-WG to be doing right now, as the version 1.0 specification is now out of public comment and is in the final stages before becoming a GFD. This most definitely includes the issue of copyright/license of the final GFD, and just because Sam Johnston decides he’s done with the conversation does not indicate consensus in the group and/or the organization.
-- Chris
On 28/3/10 16:29 , "Sam Johnston" <samj@samj.net> wrote:
Thijs,
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Thijs Metsch <Thijs.Metsch@sun.com> wrote:
How do you wanna finish a spec without this issue fixed? I wanna finish
it now...We can leave the conall. But I have the feeling that not
everything is settled/cleared out yet. So we need to discuss it and if
we do that by mail it's gonna take ages...
I've said all I care to say on the subject - if you guys want to have a conf call about it then knock yourselves out, just don't expect it to change anything on my side. We have far more important things to be doing right now.
Sam
_______________________________________________
occi-wg mailing list
occi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg