On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Andre Merzky <andre@merzky.net> wrote:
An alternative, but somewhat more heavyweight/slower, and
thus only ustified when there is vested interest from
multiple sides:
* Extensible spec released, implementors have at it
* MacroHard wants to talk about RAID levels for their upcoming* It's not in the spec so they propose an extension
BigDisk
package to us (aka OCCI-WG)
* we discuss it, think it's a good idea (or not), and
produce a formal specification document
* implementors hack at it, and interop if proven by
multiple implementations
* JuniperBerry see MacroHard's BigDisk eating their lunch and want to
add a similar feature to their LittleDisk* it's already specified so nothing needs to be done - bingo,
interoperability
PS.: I am not sure if OGF would go into the space of
maintaining registries, or such. OGF's business is to
produce specification documents, and to host the
infrastructure for doing so. But I am sure that, if a
registry is the way to go, we'll find a host for that...