Guys, here a summary of the KIS approaches as discussed at OGF42
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1x3_exe7RD6orOhwRajFNJwXxgV1zXHIZR0W…
Andy
Andy Edmonds Æ
Senior Researcher, ICCLab
Institute of Information Technology
Zürich University of Applied Sciences
http://www.cloudcomp.ch, @dizz
On 16 September 2014 12:17, Augusto Ciuffoletti <augusto(a)di.unipi.it> wrote:
> I agree with you that notification should be considered as a model, as
> an extension that introduces new resources and links, just like IaaS
> Infrastructure. I guess that this gives us all the tools to produce an
> effective model, without the side effects of introducing new core concepts.
>
> I do not agree about the limitations you address: this depends on how we
> model the relevant concepts. If we'd use mixins, you could associate them
> virtually to anything, but for the same reason they are weak in formulating
> recommendations. So it is really relevant to use the right tool for a given
> task.
>
> I hope to be able to propose my idea about that by the beginning of the
> next week. Suggestions are always welcome.
>
> Augusto
>
> PS: thanks to all organizers and participants to the OGF sessions, for a
> very productive and exciting meeting. In these times it is hard to find one
> :-/
>
> 2014-09-16 10:10 GMT+02:00 Jean Parpaillon <jean.parpaillon(a)free.fr>:
>
>> Hi Augusto, all,
>> Thanks for all the interesting discussions in OGF, first.
>>
>> Regarding the notifications, we discussed 2 approaches:
>> - the first include the notion of notification into the meta-model, with
>> versions of it in each rendering/protocol
>> - the second one add categories for a notification system, hence a model
>>
>> IMO, the second approach, hence simpler, has the problem of being
>> limited to notifications on resources. I don't see how to plug
>> notifications on collections, links or user mixins, for instance.
>>
>> Have I missed somthing ?
>>
>> Another possible approach should be to consider notifications only at
>> the level of protocol, not touching meta-model.
>>
>> My opinion is we should first think about at which level we want to
>> introduce this notion of notifications.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jean
>>
>>
>> Le jeudi 11 septembre 2014 à 10:05 +0100, Augusto Ciuffoletti a écrit :
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> >
>> > talking and listening to people here during OGF42, I perceived that
>> > there is a strong demand for a notification mechanism inside OCCI,
>> > that is able to carry an asynchronous notification about a relevant
>> > event. For instance, "this job is now running" from an hypothetical
>> > job resource, or "this VM is going to shut down in 5 seconds" from a
>> > Compute.
>> >
>> > This demand is in fact more compelling than that about monitoring, and
>> > may be in fact integrated in OCCI-monitoring at a later time. So I'll
>> > give precedence to OCCI-Notification.
>> >
>> >
>> > The specification is very simple: one single link ("Notification"),
>> > and two types of mixins, one for the triggering event, one for the
>> > triggered action.
>> >
>> >
>> > Any "thumb up" or input from you is relevant, and I will submit soon a
>> > proposal about that.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Augusto Ciuffoletti
>> > Dipartimento di Informatica
>> > Università di Pisa
>> > 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > occi-wg mailing list
>> > occi-wg(a)ogf.org
>> > https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/occi-wg
>>
>> --
>> Jean Parpaillon
>> Open Source Consultant
>> Phone: +33 6 30 10 92 86
>> im: jean.parpaillon(a)gmail.com
>> skype: jean.parpaillon
>> linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/jeanparpaillon/en
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Augusto Ciuffoletti
> Dipartimento di Informatica
> Università di Pisa
> 56100 - Pisa (Italy)
>
FYI
Review Request: rubygem-occi-core - OCCI toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138455
----------------------------------------------------------------
This package (rubygem-occi-core) is APPROVED by mtasaka
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please contribute to other review requests if you are registered.
Dear OCCI working group members,
We are pleased to announce you the acceptance of our paper " An OCCI Compliant Model for PaaS Resources Description and Provisioning " in the Computer Journal published by Oxford University Press.The paper details our proposed Application and Platform resources OCCI extensions.
An early view of the paper is available at: http://comjnl.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2014/11/19/comjnl.bxu132
A free link access can be provided to interested members who do not have access to the Oxford journals platform.
Sincerely,
Sami YANGUI
PhD
SIMBAD Team - UMR SAMOVAR CNRS
Tel : 01 60 76 42 88
Fax : 01 60 76 47 80
Web page : http://www-inf.int-evry.fr/~yangui/
9 rue Charles Fourier
91011 Évry Cedex
Une école de l'Institut Mines-Télécom
Perhaps of interest to these groups. Remote dial-in phone-based audio and webex slide streaming is apparently planned - see information at the link below.
Topic:
Open vSwitch Fall 2014 Conference
Monday, November 17, 2014 at 8:00 AM - Tuesday, November 18, 2014 at 5:00 PM (PST)
Palo Alto, CA
Link:
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/open-vswitch-fall-2014-conference-tickets-1316…
Alan
