January 2013 - occi-wg - lists.ogf.org

Dasein Cloud
by Thijs Metsch 23 Jun '13

23 Jun '13

Hi, Just to inform you that there is a cool project going on called Dasein-Cloud. http://dasein-cloud.sourceforge.net/ On the website it reads: Dasein Cloud is an Open Source Java API made available by enStratus Networks LLC under the terms of the Apache License 2.0. This API specifies cloud-independent interfaces for enabling an application to access resources across multiple clouds. If you are interested have a look - and it might be great to implement OCCI in their someday! Cheers, -Thijs -- Thijs Metsch Senior Software Engineer Grid and Cloud Technology Platform Computing GmbH Europaring 60 D-40878 Ratingen http://www.platform.com http://www.nohuddleoffense.de/ - http://www.twitter.com/befreax

3 2

OCCI Monitoring API
by Augusto Ciuffoletti 08 Feb '13

08 Feb '13

Dear all, following the extremely fruitful meeting in Zurich, here is the revision of the proposed document. A few anticipations about the content: - the concepts are always the same: abstraction from short-lived details using mixins, extract/aggregate/publish pipe for the measurements - the syntax is different: I tried to make it simpler and more powerful: only 2 kinds in the model (one resource and one link), but the monitoring infrastructure may be hierarchical from 0 to n levels - a section about conformance levels has been added: the monitoring API is optional, so we need to define a level 0 to avoid confusion. The other two levels corresponds to the capability of creating user mixins (level 2) or not (level 1) - there is a detailed example of a simple case using an HTTP rendering You can directly interact with the LaTeX document if you like, though the pdf is attached as well. The LaTeX document is available on a specific collaboration platform: www.writeLatex.com. It is possible to update the document, but I ask you to follow these simple instruction, to avoid to lose the control of the document. If you want to add a note, please use the \rem command, whose usage is described by the following example: \rem{Augusto Ciuffoletti}{My comment goes here} placed near the sentence you want to comment. A footnote will be generated ("My comment goes here"), signed with your id ("Augusto Ciuffoletti"). You can access the document here https://www.writelatex.com/26835vgbcrcwithout authentication needed. The browser window is divided into two parts: on one side you can edit the source, on the other you see the updated document view. You can also download the pdf or a zip of the current state of the document. There is no "revision history", so it is impossible to "undo" a change. Augusto -- Augusto Ciuffoletti Dipartimento di Informatica Università di Pisa 56100 - Pisa (Italy)

6 12

Fwd: Cloud Plugfest Dates and Details for 2013
by Sill, Alan 30 Jan '13

30 Jan '13

Please review the dates below and comment; also indicate in which (or all) of these OCCI WG members might be interested to participate. Our relationship with SNIA and ETSI, and hopefully soon with DMTF, on these practical hands-on workshops has been extremely valuable and has produced some significant progress in related projects and implementations, e.g. the EGI Federated Cloud and I hope soon also FutureGrid, as well as progress with our more commercially-oriented partners such as CompatibleOne. We just completed our seventh (!) in this series of Cloud Plugfests, and participation looks good for the future -- but we need all of you to speak up about what events you would like to attend and how to handle the planning process for these Cloud Plugfest events. To the latter point, I plan to request a session at OGF 37 (Mar. 11-13 in Charlottesville, VA, USA) to discuss the planning process for Cloud Plugfests and other similar OGF community external engagements. I hope you will attend, and don't forget to check out the OGF 37 planning pages at the link below to put in yyour owwn OCCI-WG session requests. http://ogf.org/ogf37 Alan P.S.: Although we were not able to get our SNIA partners to move their Technical Symposium from Austin to co-locate with us in Charlottesville this march - we did try, but planning was too advanced - we do encourage those of you who will be traveling to OGF 37 to consider going from Charlottesville to Austin the following week to participate in work on CDMI with SNIA in the context of their Technical Symposium, which will be the US site of the March 2013 Cloud Plugfest. Remote participation *is* possible and is supported if you want to work on interoperability testing in the Cloud Plugfests, and there will be other plugfest-like activities at OGF 37, as well as the planning discussion mentioned above. Please feel free to contact your WG chairs and/or Area Director Richard Hughes, or me directly if you would like to hold one, and fill out the session request in the Call for Session Requests on the OGF 37 web page. Begin forwarded message: From: "Mancuso, Tom" <tom.mancuso(a)snia.org<mailto:tom.mancuso@snia.org>> Subject: Cloud Plugfest Dates and Details for 2013 Date: January 28, 2013 2:03:04 PM CST To: "planners(a)cloudplugfest.org<mailto:planners@cloudplugfest.org>" <planners(a)cloudplugfest.org<mailto:planners@cloudplugfest.org>> Hi All - Please review the info below and let me know what needs updating. I’d like to get all dates for 2013 posted on the website. All - an attempt to create a view of plugfests this year. Please take a look and add updates to table then reply back to group. Thx! - Tom 2013 Dates Series # “Cloud Plugfest #” Theme/Focus Planned Activities Locations (a = anchor) Sponsor Notes Comments January 29 -30 #?? CDMI - Plugfest - Demos San Jose, CA (a) SNIA CSI Co-located with SNIA Winter Technical Symposium should this be art of the Cloud Plugfest “series?” March 19 - 21 #08 CIMI - Plugfest US - Austin, TX (a) EU - Sophia-Antipolis, FR SNIA CSI Co-located with SNIA March Technical Symposium July 23 - 25 #09 - Plugfest US - Portland, OR (a) EU - ??? SNIA/DMTF Co-located with DMTF Alliance Partner Technical Summit (APTS) September 16-18 #?? CDMI - Plugfest US - Santa Clara, CA (a) EU - ??? SNIA CSI Co-located with SNIA Storage Developers Conference (SDC) Full plugfest or mini plugfest? October ?? #10 OCCI -Workshop, -Interoperability Demo -Multiple Interop testing sessions (~CloudPlugfest) EU - Berlin, DE (a) US - ?? ETSI Held in conjunction with OCEAN project coordinated w/ETSI Tom Mancuso Senior Program Manager, SMI Storage Networking Industry Association _______________________________________ SNIA Mobile: 719.491.2614 tom.mancuso(a)snia.org<mailto:tom.mancuso@snia.org> www.snia.org<http://www.snia.org/> Follow SNIA: [twitter-128x128.png]<http://www.snia.org/about/socialmedia/twitter> [facebookf.png] <http://www.facebook.com/SNIA.ORG> [linkedin_256.png] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/snia> [blog.gif] <http://www.sniablog.org/> [video.gif] <http://www.snia.org/news_events/multimedia>

1 0

JSON Rendering
by Feldhaus, Florian 29 Jan '13

29 Jan '13

Please find attached the current version of the JSON Rendering. There was no change since the last mail from Ralf on 2. October 2012. Please send any feedback / open issues to the mailinglist so that we can address it in the next OCCI ConfCall. The rOCCI team implemented the current state of the JSON document and you can check it out with the e.g. the following commands (needs ruby and rubygems to be installed): gem install occi irb require 'occi' compute=Occi::Infrastructure::Compute.new compute.title='Title' compute.summary='Summary' compute.architecture='x64' compute.cores=1 compute.hostname='hostname' compute.speed=1.0 compute.memory=1 compute.link 'http://myservice/123' collection=Occi::Collection.new collection.resources << compute collection.to_json exit Cheers, Florian

1 0

Request for input on expected timeline: promotion of OCCI P-REC to REC status standards
by Sill, Alan 24 Jan '13

24 Jan '13

Dear OCCI working group leaders and members and Richard (Infrastructure Area Director), This message is related to a review I am pursuing of OGF standards that are currently in the "Proposed Recommendation" category and that are likely to have accumulated progress on the path towards full recommendation status. As background, and as you probably know, the decision to move forward to full REC status is left to the working group, and usually takes place when the group feels that the standards has reached maturity or at least functional completeness as a result of experience gathered from multiple implementations in the field. A minimum of six months of experience with the published proposed recommendation is required. Often OGF working groups take longer, typically 1-2 years, before they are ready to advance a document to the next level. When experience from these implementations has been gathered, it can be fed back to bring the proposed recommendation to a full recommendation status. These results are documented by one or more associated OGF publications in the "Experimental" category. Such documents can be written at any appropriate time and do not have to be associated directly with a desire to move from P-REC to REC status, so you can think of these as providing building blocks along the way. Once there is a desire to promote a proposed to a full recommendation, an expert review is initiated, led by the Area Director. The written output of this review is supplemented by the results of a public comment period somewhat similar to the one that you went through to produce the initial proposed recommendation. The relevant OGF council (in this case the Standards Council) then reviews the results and makes the external review available to OGF members, then makes a decision on the request to advance the document. We have seen several OGF documents make the transition from P-REC to REC, and the result has generally been a better, more complete specification set and greater recognition of the maturity of the work based on completion of this process. Some documents have languished, however, and while we may still think of OCCI as new, it has seen significant uptake in the community and has gathered real-world experience that makes me think that embarking on this process for one or more of the three basic OCCI specifications would make sense, while starting documents on other aspects of the OCCI working group product set. Please consider this note to be an invitation to look over the process outlined in sections 4.5.3 and 4.5.4 of GFD.152, and a request to proceed accordingly depending on your progress and desires. Best regards, Alan Alan Sill, Ph.D Vice President of Standards, Open Grid Forum Senior Scientist, High Performance Computing Center Adjunct Professor of Physics, TTU ==================================================================== : Alan Sill, Texas Tech University Office: Drane 162, MS 4-1167 : : e-mail: Alan.Sill(a)ttu.edu ph. 806-834-5940 fax 806-834-4358 : ====================================================================

1 0

Cloud Plugfest at SNIA Winter Symposium - January 29 & 30 - Announcement
by Mancuso, Tom 16 Jan '13

16 Jan '13

Hi All, There will be a mini, 2-day, Cloud Plugfest in San Jose, CA during the SNIA Winter Symposium on January 29th & 30th. The plugfest will take place in the evening hours between 5:30 PM and 9:30 PM Pacific Time. CDMI will be the focus, but other cloud standards-based implementations are welcome. Face-to-face participation is the preferred format. There is no cost/fee to participate in the symposium or the plugfest, but registration is required for both. Register for plugfest: http://eepurl.com/tPmLT Register for symposium: http://www.snia.org/events/wintersymp2013 If you have specific questions about the plugfest, please contact Mark Carlson directly at mark.carlson(a)oracle.com<mailto:mark.carlson@oracle.com> Regards, - Tom Tom Mancuso Senior Program Manager, SMI Storage Networking Industry Association _______________________________________ SNIA Mobile: 719.491.2614 tom.mancuso(a)snia.org<mailto:tom.mancuso@snia.org> www.snia.org<http://www.snia.org/> Follow SNIA: [cid:image001.png@01CDF33C.3CBB5630]<http://www.snia.org/about/socialmedia/twitter> [cid:image002.png@01CDF33C.3CBB5630] <http://www.facebook.com/SNIA.ORG> [cid:image003.png@01CDF33C.3CBB5630] <http://www.linkedin.com/company/snia> [cid:image004.png@01CDF33C.3CBB5630] <http://www.sniablog.org/> [cid:image005.png@01CDF33C.3CBB5630] <http://www.snia.org/news_events/multimedia>

1 0

[occi] CAMP briefing requested...
by Michael Behrens 11 Jan '13

11 Jan '13

Can someone from the OCCI WG present an introduction to OCCI at the OASIS CAMP F2F in a couple of weeks? It's in San Antonio, TX, however remote presentation is welcome. Jan 23rd through the 25th. I'm not sure what day exactly, however I would expect it to take about an hour. I'll be able to help. Please let me know - thanks! -- Michael Behrens

1 0

Re: [occi-wg] CloudWatch Proposal & OGF contributions & participation & LoS letter
by Sill, Alan 02 Jan '13

02 Jan '13

Silvana, Many apologies for the delay in responding. I am afraid I have been out of commission with a nasty but undetermined illness that has finally run its course, which took me out of communication for most of the last part of December. I have distributed your request within OGF for feedback. While I suspect there is considerable interest on many points that you mention below from several people who are active in OGF, in practice we are all also quite busy, and I know that many are working on their own EC funding proposals also. Let me do what I can to interpolate from what I know and what I have discussed recently with people involved in OGF work groups. 1) OGF explicitly tries not to take sides between competing projects during the selection phase of funding, but has always been happy to provide general letters of encouragement and support. As you note, OGF is already involved in several projects on its own that are similar to and compatible with the goals that you describe, and if helpful, we would be happy to provide a letter describing these and offering to exchange information on a cooperative basis with CloudWATCH. (Of course, we would do so for any other project that asked, in general terms, as well.) So a partnership of the sort that you describe in part A) below is certainly possible. 2) In terms of collaboration that would more closely occupy members of the OGF community in common standards profile definition, we are also happy to cooperate. We do already have direct liaison relationships with ISO JTC1 SC 38 and the ITU-T JCA-Cloud committees, it should be noted and intend to present an OGF profile and list of relevant standards at the joint meeting of these bodies in Geneva, just before CloudScape V. As you know, OGF is a diverse community with a wide range of individual talent as well as project and some corporate participation, but our processes for developing, refining, approving and publishing official OGF documents are well defined, so it is easy therefore for us to present and explain the output of these processes in terms of the published documents to outside observers. But that having been said, it is always valuable to encounter fresh perspectives and external impetus to refine and extend the OGF document set and explanations of our output. I think given these restrictions that it may be best for us to provide you with a general letter of support in broad terms from OGF that does not take sides during selection, but offers support for your goals of identifying the relevant IAAS standards that you seek to study in this project. Of course, OGF does have already some of the most successful standards in the field in this area, so we would be delighted to work with you more closely if you can identify a way for us to do so that does not put us unduly into competition with other projects we may also work with and support. Please let me know what will work best for you. I can get a letter to you in short order, now that I am recovered. Alan On Dec 17, 2012, at 8:44 AM, Silvana Muscella <s.muscella(a)trust-itservices.com> wrote: > Dear Alan, > > I am coming to you to understand what contribution you would like to carry out with the CloudWATCH proposal. > We would clearly like to have engagement with OGF & specifically the efforts taking place around OCCI, SAJACC, Cloud Plugfests and would like to understand whether OGF would be interested in 2 options: > > A) coming on board as a full partner to the project (if you are US legal entity it would be without funding effort I am afraid the EC has confirmed this to me) but it would be very good to have you listed yo be able to have support from your working group the efforts we would like to drive forward in the development of a common standards profile. > > B) Alternatively, we would like to set aside some budget if the partner option is not a feasible one to have members of OGF collaborating with CloudWATCH around the use case activity as well as the common standards profile definition. > > We hope you would see this as an opportunity Alan - we do not have the confirmation of ETSI's participation yet but we do see as the use case activity as a work which can support that coordinated by ETSI in the first quarter of 2013 to drive forward the common standards profile in the second half of 2013. > > Should you need any further information please let me know I will be happy to provide this & I look forward to hearing from you soon. > I copy below the current partner overview list and the CloudWatch abstract. I am also providing a Letter of Support template that I would value OGF completing - I have tailored it with some suggestions in red for OGF specifically feel free to tweak as you see fit (minus the abstract obviously). > > best wishes & thank you Alan . silvana > (Deadline Friday 21st December 2012 for feedback) > > > Partners: > • TRUST-IT Services -UK, > • EGI.eu -NL, > • Oxford eResearch Centre - UK, > • FRAUNHOFER -DE, > • ETSI - FR, - not yet confirmed > • Business Software Alliance – BE, > • ICT Legal Consulting –IT, > • Cloud Security Alliance CSA- UK,. > > > CloudWATCH abstract > Today, there is considerable new demand emerging for e-Science services, which could be satisfied by public or private cloud services and infrastructures including not only physical resources, but also data sources, services leading right the way through to computation if existing and perceived barriers can be mitigated. However, given the current fragmented landscape, there is a need for a coherent set of policies, standards and services supporting the development of a pan-European infrastructure & software to achieve economies of scale and a sustainable ecosystem, otherwise much of the potential demand may risk to remain unsatisfied. CloudWATCH will work to build on the current e-Research examples (from the private and public sector) to support the broader needs of the private and public sector including e-Government and e-Science. > It will identify global Use Cases in both European & international cloud activities, involving Open Collaborative Models, demonstrating interoperability, portability and reversibility which would also cover policy and legal requirements, such as SLA management, as well as technical requirements. CloudWATCH will support the development of a common set of Cloud Policies & help achieve harmonisation in participating communities requirements for clouds across geographical and application areas. The Use Cases identified can be mapped onto Cloud Standards for the purpose of European governments. > Research centres and government agencies will considerably benefit from the creation of a common framework for interoperability therefore, CloudWATCH will make a significant contribution to Cloud interoperability which is critical in order to bring cloud innovation to users and to accelerate its adoption. > Building a common standards profile for the technical interoperability of IaaS cloud services, would consolidate & exploit the already existing cloud federation and integration efforts in Europe and CloudWATCH will be able to take these test bed to the European hosting and cloud provider industry. CLoudWATCH would build on the already existing cloud federation and integration efforts in Europe and elsewhere, leading to a publication through a recognised SDO in this area involved in the expert group. > > To facilitate adoption of this profile a mechanism to certify compliance with the profile will also be developed and operated by a member of the consortia, allowing for different actors within the European Sphere to provide confidence to adopter communities that their services are interoperable around open standards. > CloudWATCH facilitates international engagement, consolidated from past coordinated efforts (such as SIENA & the Cloudscapeseries) on major cloud standards achievements through the Pool of Thought Leaders (PTL). > > > On 13/12/2012 14:25, Anders Kingstedt wrote: >> Silvana and David, >> Thank you for the interesting CC earlier today. I’m writing this just to summarize the call-to-action and to verify that I understand things correctly. >> >> 1 – I will contact the ISO/IEC management to inform them of the ongoing work in Europe. I will propose that ISO as an organization engages in the work. I’ve requested a meeting with Don Deutsch, SC 38 Chair, tomorrow evening (pending his approval and availability). Dave – would you be able to attend? (I’ll include you on the participants list). >> 2 – If deemed appropriate, I will take on the responsibility of representing ISO SC38 (the sub committee of JTC1 working on Cloud Computing and SOA). >> 3 – The main objective, from an overarching point of view, is to A – make sure that all parties involved are taking decisions and plan their work based on a “full disclosure” basis and B – we commonly work towards the goal of avoiding work being done in parallel / with overlap. I believe the current work in the ISO – ITU-T CT to be of some significance. >> 4 – I will run the Objectives list by some of the experts in the ISO-ITU-T CT. The intention of that would be to map the listed Objectives with the corresponding objectives of our ongoing work. I’m not sure the we have 1-to-1 mapping, but I’m certain that some objectives coincide. >> >> As you possibly understood during our CC I have not had a chance to read up on many of the initiatives you talked about, Silvana. Please bear this in mind. I apologize, in advance, for potentially proposing actions that have already been covered in / by ongoing initiatives in Europe (or elsewhere). >> >> Keeping track of what is going on in the standards space IS in fact a daunting task. I would argue that the EC itself is not fully aligned in terms of synchronizing various initiatives coming out of Brussels (I do have some insight into the LSP arena, being involved in PEPPOL and the upcoming e-SENS project). But it IS an overwhelming task to understand what is what and “who does what”. In all honesty, Cloud Computing (in this case) is in itself of course a very complex thing consisting of many different elements – architectural blocks, technology, agreements, business models, its own set of vocabulary, functional as well as non-functional requirements, use cases and more. One single area might in itself be hard to comprehend and many different aspects might be covered in work done in many different organizations. Sometimes, too, cross cutting aspects are covered in different circumstances, adding to the challenge of getting a grip on how things are related…* >> >> * - the complexity of CC is indeed reflected in many of the long and hard discussions we’re having right now in the ISO-ITU-T Collaborative Team effort on Reference Architecture…Service Delivery is just one example of an aspect that has been presented as an potential future work element of SC38. That work naturally needs to be aligned with the SC7 is doing in a bordering area. Cross cutting aspects such as interoperability issues, security, platform API:s and more are other examples of elements that I know are being subject to standards development in different SDO’s. Sometimes, out of practical purposes, topics however might need to be processed in different contexts (as opposed to in one place) out sheer practical purposes. However well founded it might be to concentrate work in one are to one single place / organization, a topic sometimes needs to be processed and applied to a specific domain for it to be useful. The way to avoid unnecessary multiplicity and to avoid double work is obviously to communicate and make sure that information is available and flowing “freely”. Which is what we’re trying to do now, right? J >> >> More soon. >> >> All the best, >> >> Anders Kingstedt | Softarc AB >> +46 70 2720304 | anders.kingstedt(a)softarc.se | Skype:anders.kingstedt >> Vasagatan 15-17| SE-111 20 Stockholm | Sweden | www.softarc.se >> Co Convenor, ISO ITU-T CT (Cloud Computing) | Editor, CEN ISSS WS BII-2 >> >> Från: Silvana Muscella [mailto:s.muscella@trust-itservices.com] >> Skickat: den 13 december 2012 11:22 >> Till: Anders Kingstedt >> Kopia: dpb(a)19770.org; 'Hilary Hanahoe'; 'Stephanie Parker'; n.ferguson(a)trust-itservices.com >> Ämne: Re: SV: CC Thursday >> >> Dear Anders, David, >> >> just sending you some objectives of the call text below in preparation to our skype call shortly - can you give me a window of another 15 mins please so can I call you in at 11:45? cET >> thank you >> silvana >> >> >> OBJECTIVE 1:Identify Global Use Cases in both European & international cloud activities, involving Open Collaborative Models, demonstrating interoperability, portability and reversibility. They should include not just technical requirements but also policy and legal requirements such as SLA management. >> >> OBJECTIVE 2: Support the development of a common set of Cloud Policies & help achieve harmonisation in participating communities requirements for clouds across geographical and application areas. The Use Cases identified can be mapped onto Cloud Standards for the purpose of European governments. >> >> OBJECTIVE 3: Develop a common standards profile for the technical interoperability of IaaS cloud services building on the already existing cloud federation and integration efforts in Europe and elsewhere, leading to a publication through a recognised SDO in this area. To facilitate adoption of this profile a mechanism to certify compliance with the profile will also be developed and operated by a member of the consortia, allowing for different actors within the European Sphere to provide confidence to adopter communities that their services are interoperable around open standards. >> >> OBJECTIVE 4: Facilitate international engagement, consolidated from past coordinated efforts (such as through the sustainable effort Cloudscapeseries.eu, past projects: OGF-Europe & SIENA) on major cloud standards achievements through the Pool of Stakeholders on Global Interoperability through Standardisation (PSGI). This could also achieved by organising the eConcertation meetings on an annual basis and ensuring the RTD projects funded are fully aligned & exposed to current cloud standards efforts. >> >> On 11/12/2012 16:34, Anders Kingstedt wrote: >> Perfect – I’ll book 11.30 in my calendar / A >> >> Anders Kingstedt | Softarc AB >> +46 70 2720304 | anders.kingstedt(a)softarc.se | Skype:anders.kingstedt >> Vasagatan 15-17| SE-111 20 Stockholm | Sweden | www.softarc.se >> Co Convenor, ISO ITU-T CT (Cloud Computing) | Editor, CEN ISSS WS BII-2 >> >> Från: Silvana Muscella [mailto:s.muscella@trust-itservices.com] >> Skickat: den 11 december 2012 16:27 >> Till: Anders Kingstedt >> Kopia: dpb(a)19770.org; 'Hilary Hanahoe'; 'Stephanie Parker'; n.ferguson(a)trust-itservices.com >> Ämne: Re: CC Thursday >> >> Dear Anders, >> yes can we make it at midday as I have a meeting that could run over. >> I have found you on skype if you can accept me I shall call you in from there. Should David wish to participate too then please David send me your skype details as well. >> with thanks >> silvana >> >> On 11/12/2012 16:16, Anders Kingstedt wrote: >> Should we set up a CC on Thursday, say at 11.30? If so – let me know if this is possible. I’ve got access to GoToMeeting if you plan for multiple participants. >> Best regards, >> >> Anders Kingstedt | Softarc AB >> +46 70 2720304 | anders.kingstedt(a)softarc.se | Skype:anders.kingstedt >> Vasagatan 15-17| SE-111 20 Stockholm | Sweden | www.softarc.se >> Co Convenor, ISO ITU-T CT (Cloud Computing) | Editor, CEN ISSS WS BII-2 >> >> Från: Silvana Muscella [mailto:s.muscella@trust-itservices.com] >> Skickat: den 11 december 2012 09:47 >> Till: Anders Kingstedt >> Kopia: dpb(a)19770.org; 'Hilary Hanahoe'; 'Stephanie Parker'; n.ferguson(a)trust-itservices.com >> Ämne: Re: SV: CloudWatch - CSA proposal dedicated funding set aside for ISO efforts here >> >> Dear Anders, >> can you provide us with an overview of your company by the way as I cannot see an English version correct ? >> with thanks >> silvana >> >> >> On 10/12/2012 20:48, Anders Kingstedt wrote: >> Dear Dave, Silvana and Hilary et al, >> I’m delighted that Dave went through the trouble of hunting me down (I changed jobs in August). I been talking with Jamil Chawki (ITU-T SG13), with whom I’m currently working as convenor in the ISO – ITU-T collaborative team (a ISO – ITU-T joint effort to produce global standards within the Cloud Computing space). I suggest that we set up a conference call to discuss how ISO can fit into the picture. Incidentally, I’ve discussed the EC’s Cloud Computing Cloud Strategy with some of the influential stakeholders here in Sweden – I’m involved in several EU level projects (such e-SENS, OpenPEPPOL and the CEN WS BII/BII 2) and believe that a combined effort to expose and develop (where needed) standards related to Cloud Computing is indeed crucial in order successfully implement the EU Cloud Computing strategy. >> >> Let me know when, at your convenience, you can participate in a CC. >> >> All the best, >> >> Anders Kingstedt | Softarc AB >> +46 70 2720304 | anders.kingstedt(a)softarc.se | Skype:anders.kingstedt >> Vasagatan 15-17| SE-111 20 Stockholm | Sweden | www.softarc.se >> Co Convenor, ISO ITU-T CT (Cloud Computing) | Editor, CEN ISSS WS BII-2 >> >> Från: dpb(a)19770.org [mailto:dpb@19770.org] >> Skickat: den 10 december 2012 18:27 >> Till: 'Silvana Muscella'; 'Hilary Hanahoe' >> Kopia: 'Stephanie Parker'; n.ferguson(a)trust-itservices.com; Anders Kingstedt >> Ämne: RE: CloudWatch - CSA proposal dedicated funding set aside for ISO efforts here >> >> Hi Silvana, >> >> I’ve written to Anders Kingstedt to get his input, as he is the best placed to speak for Cloud Computing in Europe for ISO (or ISO/IEC), as he is based in Sweden, and is co-convener of SC38 WG3 which is the working group specifically responsible for Cloud Computing. [I previously gave you his address as anders.kingstedt(a)ecru.se which I have just tried, but which bounced. I’ve found a more recent address which is anders.kingstedt(a)SOFTARC.SE and now sent my query to him there.] Cloud Computing potentially includes all of IT, and hence all of ISO/IEC, so much that is relevant to Cloud Computing in ISO/IEC happens outside of SC38 WG3, with the work in SC7 WG21 on Software Asset Management being a major case in point. I would like to see more coordination between EC efforts and ISO/IEC efforts. >> >> You are welcome to follow up with Anders directly if you wish. Alternatively, I will get back to you when I hear back from him. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Dave Bicket >> >> From: Silvana Muscella [mailto:s.muscella@trust-itservices.com] >> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2012 10:23 AM >> To: dpb(a)19770.org; Hilary Hanahoe >> Cc: Stephanie Parker; n.ferguson(a)trust-itservices.com >> Subject: CloudWatch - CSA proposal dedicated funding set aside for ISO efforts here >> >> Dear David, >> >> I am putting together a support action for the European commission deadline 15th January 2013. >> >> ETSI are being approached to join several consortia - so we do not know whether they will choose to come in on ours if they do not we shall go ahead of course an ensure we have the buy in from the SDOs . >> I like the idea of providing dedicated, funding support to the SDOs & in your case with ISO the proposal would be working on efforts to synchronise this globally & the results could feed into the roadmap that ETSI coordinates and as part of the European cloud strategy. >> >> I have elaborated a work plan as well - who can I talk to in ISO to see how we can structure this in with the effort in the attachment - especially under WP2 & WP3. >> Would ISO be interested in coming forward with this on a more coordinated level? >> best wishes >> silvana >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2634/5448 - Release Date: 12/09/12 >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------ >> Silvana Muscella >> >> Managing Director - Trust-IT Services Ltd >> >> Tel +39 050 28359 >> Mobile +39 346 2233822 >> Web Trust-itservices.com >> Skype silvana.muscella >> Twitter TrustITSiv >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2634/5450 - Release Date: 12/10/12 >> >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------ >> Silvana Muscella >> >> Managing Director - Trust-IT Services Ltd >> >> Tel +39 050 28359 >> Mobile +39 346 2233822 >> Web Trust-itservices.com >> Skype silvana.muscella >> Twitter TrustITSiv >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2634/5450 - Release Date: 12/10/12 >> >> >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------ >> Silvana Muscella >> >> Managing Director - Trust-IT Services Ltd >> >> Tel +39 050 28359 >> Mobile +39 346 2233822 >> Web Trust-itservices.com >> Skype silvana.muscella >> Twitter TrustITSiv >> No virus found in this message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2634/5454 - Release Date: 12/12/12 >> > > > -- > ------------------------------------------ > Silvana Muscella > > Managing Director - Trust-IT Services Ltd > > Tel +39 050 28359 > Mobile +39 346 2233822 > Web Trust-itservices.com > Skype silvana.muscella > Twitter TrustITSiv > > <Letterofsupport_OGF.docx>

1 0