Dear members of the NML and NSI working groups, A draft specification of the urn:ogf:network namespace is available at https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc16260 Please be aware that this specification is NOT fully backwards compatible with the three existing uses: * GLIF * PerfSONAR * AutoGOLE For details, see section 8 in the document. This draft constitutes discussion with different interested parties over the last few years. We are pleased to place this draft into working group last call. Please leave any comments you may have on list. The plan is to place this document in public last call right after OGF 36. Any comments received before Sun Sep 30 will be taken into account before OGF 36. We like to thank the members of the working groups for their input so far. Regards, Freek Dijkstra Jeroen van der Ham
Dear members of the NML, NMC and NSI working groups, This is a reminder about the WG last call of the urn:ogf:network URN specification. Two minor clarifications have been made (regarding rewriting of case, and standard compatibility when accepting GLIF, PerfSONAR or AutoGOLE-based urn:ogf:network identifiers), and one reference fix. If you have any comments, please reply on list or at https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/artf6593. Thanks, Freek On 05-09-2012 20:40, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
Dear members of the NML and NSI working groups,
A draft specification of the urn:ogf:network namespace is available at https://forge.ogf.org/sf/go/doc16260
Please be aware that this specification is NOT fully backwards compatible with the three existing uses: * GLIF * PerfSONAR * AutoGOLE For details, see section 8 in the document.
This draft constitutes discussion with different interested parties over the last few years. We are pleased to place this draft into working group last call.
Please leave any comments you may have on list. The plan is to place this document in public last call right after OGF 36. Any comments received before Sun Sep 30 will be taken into account before OGF 36.
We like to thank the members of the working groups for their input so far.
Regards, Freek Dijkstra Jeroen van der Ham
participants (1)
-
Freek Dijkstra