Re: [Nsi-wg] Issue 29 in ogf-nsi-project: clarify usage of providerNSA and requesterNSA
Comment #5 on issue 29 by jmacau...@gmail.com: clarify usage of providerNSA and requesterNSA http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=29 I missed the discussion so was this change to sendingNSA and receivingNSA approved? I am not sure it provides any additional value over the existing requesterNSA and providerNSA, which at least models the NSA relationship in the message exchange. Can I assume from the "Resolution of Issue" that I can put the NSA URN into the requesterNSA and providerNSA fields again?
Comment #6 on issue 29 by guy.robe...@gmail.com: clarify usage of providerNSA and requesterNSA http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=29 Guy Roberts to document the changes that have been made.
Updates: Status: Fixed Comment #7 on issue 29 by jmacau...@gmail.com: clarify usage of providerNSA and requesterNSA http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=29 (No comment was entered for this change.)
participants (1)
-
ogf-nsi-project@googlecode.com