Re: [Nsi-wg] Issue 39 in ogf-nsi-project: STP syntax
Comment #2 on issue 39 by jmacau...@gmail.com: STP syntax http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=39 I am confused by this agreement. An STP is defined as a OGF URN that is composed of the NSnetwork and localId already. Is this asking me to break out the STP into two discrete elements?
Comment #3 on issue 39 by jeroen.v...@gmail.com: STP syntax http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=39 Yes, the relation between an STP and an NSI network should be explicitly defined, not just because of the implicit relation through the namespacing.
Updates: Owner: guy.robe...@gmail.com Labels: -FixedInVersion-1.1 FixedInVersion-2.0 Comment #4 on issue 39 by guy.robe...@gmail.com: STP syntax http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=39 this has been punted to v2.0
Updates: Owner: je...@sobieski.net Comment #5 on issue 39 by guy.robe...@gmail.com: STP syntax http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=39 (No comment was entered for this change.)
Updates: Status: Fixed Owner: jmacau...@gmail.com Comment #6 on issue 39 by jmacau...@gmail.com: STP syntax http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=39 Modified STP to contain designated networkId and localId fields to allow for underspecified routing. Also replaced technology specific attributes within the STP with an optional "label" field. Issues is fixed with update revision 32.
participants (1)
-
ogf-nsi-project＠googlecode.com