Re: [Nsi-wg] Issue 41 in ogf-nsi-project: Do we replace the replyTo field with a topology/NSA configuration lookup?

Comment #4 on issue 41 by thost...@gmail.com: Do we replace the replyTo field with a topology/NSA configuration lookup? http://code.google.com/p/ogf-nsi-project/issues/detail?id=41 I agree with Takahiro on this. Until we have a way of handling non-NSA clients (e.g., a querier / visualization tool :-)), the replyTo field is needed as the endpoint cannot be found in the topology. Similarly the requesterNSA field is not usuable for this as it is a urn (and there is no mecanism for mapping non-NSA client to an endpoint (nor can there really be).