The same goes for the unidirectional port declarations, some use
Port and Label:
<nml:Port
id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2013:netherlight-out">
<nml:Label
labeltype=
"http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/ethernet#vlan">1780-1783</nml:Label>
<nml:Relation
type=
"http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/base#isAlias">
<nml:Port
id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:nordu.net:1:in"/>
</nml:Relation>
</nml:Port>
While others use PortGroup and LabelGroup:
<nml:PortGroup
id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:nordu.net:1:out">
<nml:LabelGroup
labeltype=
"http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/ethernet#vlan">1779-1799</nml:LabelGroup>
<nml:Relation
type=
"http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2013/05/base#isAlias">
<nml:PortGroup
id="urn:ogf:network:nordu.net:2013:netherlight-in"/>
</nml:Relation>
</nml:PortGroup>
Can both ways be used?
HansT.
On 9/23/13 4:46 PM, John MacAuley
wrote:
Can someone explain to me which of the following two segments are
correct?
<nml:BidirectionalPort id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232">
<nml:PortGroup id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232:in"/>
<nml:PortGroup id="urn:ogf:network:netherlight.net:2013:port:a-gole:testbed:232:out"/>
</nml:BidirectionalPort>
or
<nml:BidirectionalPort id="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn">
<nml:name>ndn</nml:name>
<nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn-in"/>
<nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:ampath.net:2013:ndn-out"/>
</nml:BidirectionalPort>
Should Port or PortGroup be used? We
have a mix right now in our topologies.
Thanks,
John
_______________________________________________
nsi-wg mailing list
nsi-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
_______________________________________________