Radek, At SLC we agreed that it is fine to use the NSI mailing list for the NSI demo discussions. Guy -----Original Message----- From: nsi-wg-bounces@ogf.org [mailto:nsi-wg-bounces@ogf.org] On Behalf Of Radek Krzywania Sent: 28 July 2011 14:55 To: nsi-wg@ogf.org; automatedgole-pilot@internet2.edu Subject: [Nsi-wg] Few questions for the demo Hi all, I've got few questions, which applies to all of the demo participants, so I do that via email: 1) what is the most suitable mailing list for the demo issues (I did cross posting here :( ) 2) What is the relation between switchmatrix, node, and ports? Is that node has ports, and then switch is additional object that defines which ports can be switched (node-port-swtichmatrix) or node requires switchmatrix to be attached to ports (node-switchmatrix-port)? 3) as far as I understand, a GOLE is an administrative object defining organisation, while Node are collapsed network entities (switches, routers, whatever) into abstract node. Is that correct? 4) there is no global registry of edge/peering ports (we will know them as topologies will appear from partners), and their URI's. Having a single registry in one place IMHO would be useful. Best regards Radek ________________________________________________________________________ Radoslaw Krzywania Network Research and Development Poznan Supercomputing and radek.krzywania@man.poznan.pl Networking Center +48 61 850 25 26 http://www.man.poznan.pl ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg