Hi Radak-

Looking at the tif file of the GEANT topology...

- Why do you have a 1G switch matrix defined with no ports?  and why do you have a Node with two Switchmatrix objects?
- Why have you defined hasPort relationships from both the Node object and the Switchmatrix object?   This seems redundant...?   Would the proper structure have the Node->Switchmatrx->Port(s)  ??

Thanks!
Jerry

On 7/26/11 9:46 AM, Radek Krzywania wrote: 
Hi all,
In the attachment there is a first draft of the GENAT topology. There will be small changes to that, i.e. to the URIs. Some of the ports are under implementation and the final numbering is missing (x/y instead). For some external ports I guess we need to agree on URIs:
- we have connection to Internet2 - will that be also shown on Internet2 topology? If so, what would be the URI at Internet2 site?
- What would be an URI at port going to GN from Netherlight for this demo?

Best regards
Radek

________________________________________________________________________
Radoslaw Krzywania                      Network Research and Development
                                           Poznan Supercomputing and  
radek.krzywania@man.poznan.pl                   Networking Center
+48 61 850 25 26                             http://www.man.poznan.pl
________________________________________________________________________




_______________________________________________
nsi-wg mailing list
nsi-wg@ogf.org
http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg