Re: [Nsi-wg] TransactionId

I would vote for a sequence# assigned by the RA (or initiating NSA in case of a ForceEnd). This will make debugging easier too I think. J On 7/19/11 12:26 PM, John MacAuley wrote:

Peoples,

This weekend we had a lively discussion on transactionId. In the end it was agreed that we would continue to support this identifier, however it will be renamed. I have currently defined it as a uuid for uniqueness as is done in many implementations using a transactionId.

Now Inder asked if we could make it a sequence I'd to help with processing on the RA side. Comments?

Sent from my iPhone _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg