On 15 Dec 2011, at 14:13, Henrik Thostrup Jensen wrote:
3 pages sounds like a bit much actually, but as long as there is reasonable limit, it should be good.
There are four different points to be addressed here, one of which has 3 subpoints, so I think it's reasonable.
I am missing something about what to do in the case where the complete topology is not available, either due to size/performance/scaling constraints or not being published.
Being able to demonstrate how cases with multiple technologies are handled. E.g., the case where both ethernet and sonet exists in the same network and mpls can be popped/pushed on sonet, but ethernet vlans cannot, and ethernet can be carried over sonet, but not vice versa. Maybe I am getting a bit too much ahead here.
I'm not sure whether these are main requirements right now. I agree they are important, but perhaps we should defer them for now, and keep them on the radar. Perhaps make tickets? I think it's more important to make a decision now and think about how to solve these issues once we have made a decision. I don't think that these are differentiating points though. Jeroen.