Hi Inder, But in the future, we may have services like point-to-multipoint (i.e. virtual network) service, which will have temporal aspects too. So, I believe "temporal aspects" is generic to (not all but) multiple services, and putting it to the generic architecture part is better for future extension of NSI. Tomohiro On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:41:48 -0700 Inder Monga <imonga@es.net> wrote:
Dear Tomohiro,
We decided to take out the temporal aspects from the generic architecture and move it into the Connection Service discussion. The reason being that the NSI protocol message exchanges did not require a time synchronization. They mostly depend on state machines and relative timing.
Inder
On Jun 20, 2010, at 1:32 PM, Tomohiro Kudoh wrote:
Hi all,
I could not hear the later part of the previous session clearly, so maybe I miss the point, but:
- if request path is hierarchical, service instances also have hierarchical relationship. That is, a service instance is created for each provider along the path.
- temporal aspects may exist not only for the connection service but also for other (to be defined) services.
Tomohiro
_______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
--- Inder Monga http://100gbs.lbl.gov imonga@es.net http://www.es.net (510) 499 8065 (c) (510) 486 6531 (o)