Hi, It also might be worth looking at the first HARC paper (http://www.cct.lsu.edu/~maclaren/HARC/Papers/harc-gada-final.pdf), specifically figures 2 and 3, which show 2-phase commit and Paxos commit. Paxos commit is probably a better protocol for more general situations, though 2-phase commit works well when the "committer" is reliable. Dan (wishing to have more time to participate in these discussions rather than just reading the emails some of the time) On Dec 2, 2009, at 7:14 AM, Tomohiro Kudoh wrote:
Hi all,
here is an updated slide.
2009/12/2 Tomohiro Kudoh <t.kudoh@aist.go.jp>:
Hi all,
Here is a slide on 2-phase commit. Talk to you soon.
Tomohiro <2pc-updated.ppt>_______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg
-- Daniel S. Katz University of Chicago (773) 834-7186 (voice) (773) 834-3700 (fax) d.katz@ieee.org or dsk@ci.uchicago.edu http://www.ci.uchicago.edu/~dsk/