Okay, thanks. I didn't heard that one. I will update my code. John. On 2011-11-10, at 1:18 AM, Tomohiro Kudoh wrote:
Hi John,
The agreement at Lyon was, we will use urn:ogf:network:nsa: for NSA names and urn:ogf:network:nsnetwork: for physical network.
So the requester/providerNSA should be urn:ogf:network:nsa, and nsnetwork name is used for topology description and STP names.
This allows one to multiple relationship between NSA and network.
Tomohiro
On Wed, 9 Nov 2011 23:23:40 -0500 John MacAuley <john.macauley@surfnet.nl> wrote:
Implementers,
For this demo are we using the nsnetwork URN as we did in Rio or are we using the nsa URN in these fields? I need to know so I can makre sure my implementation is using the correct values.
Thanks, John. _______________________________________________ nsi-wg mailing list nsi-wg@ogf.org http://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg