I concur with Freek.

Cheers,
Aaron

On Jun 12, 2012, at 10:16 AM, Freek Dijkstra wrote:

Jeroen van der Ham wrote:

We have a couple of options going forward:

- use identifiers following NML-WG standard
a) allow domain owners free form in the opaque part
b) define that opaque part should begin with "stp:"
- try to register a different urng:ogf subnamespace

My personal ideal [*] would be (a), thus NSI saying "here is a list of
STP" and just giving a list of identifiers, without many syntax
restrictions.

(And I would be thrilled if that identifier could be a NML Port, thus
that a NSI STP is a NML Port, but that is a different discussion.)

That said, I haven't implemented an NSI interface, so feel free to
ignore me :)

Freek


[*] Well, I have some more ideals, but that's probably out of scope for
NSI :)
_______________________________________________
nsi-wg mailing list
nsi-wg@ogf.org
https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsi-wg

ESCC/Internet2 Joint Techs
July 15-19, 2012 - Palo Alto, California
Hosted by Stanford University
http://events.internet2.edu/2012/jt-stanford/