19 Jul
2011
19 Jul
'11
4:26 p.m.
Peoples, This weekend we had a lively discussion on transactionId. In the end it was agreed that we would continue to support this identifier, however it will be renamed. I have currently defined it as a uuid for uniqueness as is done in many implementations using a transactionId. Now Inder asked if we could make it a sequence I'd to help with processing on the RA side. Comments? Sent from my iPhone