19 Jul
                
                    2011
                
            
            
                19 Jul
                
                '11
                
            
            
            
        
    
                4:26 p.m.
            
        Peoples, This weekend we had a lively discussion on transactionId. In the end it was agreed that we would continue to support this identifier, however it will be renamed. I have currently defined it as a uuid for uniqueness as is done in many implementations using a transactionId. Now Inder asked if we could make it a sequence I'd to help with processing on the RA side. Comments? Sent from my iPhone