Overview of artefacts & last call

Hi all, Jeroen has made some passes on the document lately, and there have been some discussion on and off the mailing list. To keep track of issues, the list of NML artefacts has been updated: https://forge.ogf.org/sf/tracker/do/listArtifacts/projects.nml-wg/tracker.tr... About 24 new artefacts have been added in the last month, and some closed. To make progress, I took the liberty to put some issues into "Last call". I will list them here. Note that I also put some into "last call" because I want them to close, and don't think there will be many comments. If you feel I was overzealous, please let me know off-list or on-list. With that, here is the list I hope you can have a look. Some of you may have already commented on-list: artf6562: Labelsgroup described as string artf6577: layer and label encoding terminology artf6573: Make Location a subclass of Network Object artf6535: Namespace of Relations artf6552: Ordered list artf6563: NML Relation formal definition artf6537: hasTopology implicitly defined? artf6584: Properties of a Location [NEW] artf6568: Properties of Ports and Links artf6567: Removal of Domain and Network artf6542: VLAN description Propose to reject: artf6554: Allowing inverse relations artf6490: Define physical Port/Interface Furthermore, the following artefacts are important, and have a clear proposal. It would certainly be useful if you can have a look: artf6495: Define Label syntax artf6569: PortGroup and LinkGroup artf6581: Experimental features artf6582: Unnamed NML objects artf6585: nml:parameter artf6580: Relate Node/Topology to a Link artf6578: existsDuring relation artf6536: Service Syntax in XML and RDF There are more artefacts, but this is the list I like to go through this (long) list in the coming conference calls and see if we can close them. For those with little time, I tried to put all important info in the description, so you don't have to read the whole discussion if you don't have the time. Thanks for your effort in reading them. It is appreciated. Regards, Freek (PS: and yes, artefacts is proper British spelling ;) )
participants (1)
-
Freek Dijkstra