Inder, Jeroen, (and also to myself), Thank you once more for the proposal definitions on domain/topology and adaptation respectively. Could I ask for one more bit of your time? It would be beneficial for the discussions at OGF28 if these definitions are in the proposal by March 6th. Especially the proposal on domain/topology is "good enough" to be solidified in our deliverable. I'm certain that more discussion will pop up by the time we are going to created classes and attributes of these terms. I would very much appreciate it if you can copy and paste these definitions. If not, just let me know and I'll ask for another volunteer. The base document can be found at the svn repository: http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/scm/do/listRepositories/projects.nml-wg/scm The emails with the proposals are here: http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nml-wg/2010-February/000444.html http://www.ogf.org/pipermail/nml-wg/2010-January/000438.html Regards, Freek
On 22/02/2010 15:36, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
Thank you once more for the proposal definitions on domain/topology and Could I ask for one more bit of your time? It would be beneficial for the discussions at OGF28 if these definitions are in the proposal by March 6th.
Especially the proposal on domain/topology is "good enough" to be solidified in our deliverable. I'm certain that more discussion will pop up by the time we are going to created classes and attributes of these terms.
Done. Jeroen.
participants (2)
-
Freek Dijkstra
-
Jeroen van der Ham