Jeroen, You asked me to review the RDF file. A small question to start with:
<http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base> rdf:type owl:Ontology ; rdfs:label "NML Schema" .
Should this URI include the hash (#) or not? I forgot... Freek
And while I'm at it, here's one for Roman: Are the .rnc file still in use? If not, I suggest to remove them from the repository (those interested can still find them in the history). If they are used, I noticed two incorrect URIs: in nmlbase.rnc: "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml" This should be "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#" (or without hash?) In nmltypes.rnc: ""http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/isSource"" This should be ""http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#isSource" Regards, Freek
Hi Freek, W dniu 2012-12-13 17:35, Freek Dijkstra pisze:
And while I'm at it, here's one for Roman:
Are the .rnc file still in use? If not, I suggest to remove them from the repository (those interested can still find them in the history).
I'd like to keep the RNC schema. Although we have XSD it may be useful for some users in the future. I'll make needed updates very soon. Roman
If they are used, I noticed two incorrect URIs: in nmlbase.rnc: "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/nml" This should be "http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#" (or without hash?)
In nmltypes.rnc: ""http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/isSource"" This should be ""http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/base#isSource"
Regards, Freek _______________________________________________ nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg
participants (2)
-
Freek Dijkstra -
Roman Łapacz