
Hi John, Great to hear from you.
Some clarifying questions inline --
Some hopefully-not-too-mystifying answers below.
* AdaptationService: Adaptation capability in a topology or node.
John:
I would think this could happen in a port, or at least be specific to a port. Is that possible?
It certainly can be specific to a port. We introduced the concept of PortGroup to handle the case where only a subset of the Ports in a device can handle some Adaptation. What do you mean with "in a port"? In our proposal, a Port is a *logical* entity, so adaptation happens between Ports. In your question and my sentence above, we refer to Port as a physical Port in a Node (which may have multiple logcial Ports). Would it be useful to introduce another term to distinguish between the two concepts?
* Layer: A collection of Ports with common Characteristic Information (Characteristic Information is defined in ITU-T G800; we envision sublayers to be a separate layer too, but this is really up to technology-specific extensions).
can you define sublayer? Is this multiplexing within a layer using labels to encapsulate the sublayer? Or something else?
Our proposal does not distinguish between layer and sublayer. Do you need this distinction?
When a link with multiple labeled sub-links connects to a port with multiple labeled subports on a node -- What is the way that labeled links are concatenated to labeled ports -- is that cross connect? If not, what is it?
From your NSI work, I presume you are mostly interested in describing multiplexing. Are you interested to create a proposal for NML to cover
I'm not entirely sure if I follow you here. Concatenation of labeled subports in a port (which may or may not be connected to a link) seems multiplexing to me. A I would describe a cross-connect (with these terms) as the connection between a labeled subport in one port and a labeled subport in another port. However, this is all speculation on my side: we have not defined subports or labels. In fact, you have a good point with label: our current proposal does not discuss multiplexing (or inverse multiplexing), although we certainly intend to support that. In my view, labels are used for two specific purposes: 1) To distinguish between channels in a link (multiplexing) 2) To switch data in a Node (cross connects) this one or both of these topics (multiplexing and/or cross connects)? If so, I offer you my help. Regards, Freek