Freek/All; ACK -jason On 1/12/12 10:29 AM, thus spake Freek Dijkstra:
Jeroen van der Ham wrote:
- Freek will write up an example of overlapping ordered Groups to expose potential problems, also with regard to idRef XML notation.
Attached is an example. I don't see big issues right away for this XML syntax. I think it is parseable, and is possible to find the correct order of the two lists, even if one of the items in the list occurs in both lists.
I do see some issues when this is to be translated to RDF/OWL (for the record: I think that would require the introduction of some intermediate OWL resource objects to ensure that things point to the correct NML resource, perhaps both a "Ordered List" and a "Item" object are needed). However, I have not covered that. For now only XML is on the table. Is this syntax acceptable and clear? And above all, does it represent the consensus we build last year (I could not find an example with "next" in the nml-examples repository, and based this on the Salt Lake City consensus).
Regards, Freek