W dniu 2012-07-11 16:06, Roman Łapacz pisze:
W dniu 2012-07-11 15:57, Freek Dijkstra pisze:
On 11-07-2012 15:50, Roman Łapacz wrote:
Hold on, did you mean to write:
<nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/representedBy"> <nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation> </nml:Link>
Yes, but I understand that I can use Link instead of BidirectionalLink while pointing to BidirectionalLink. Sorry, I'm afraid I lost you there.
It kind of sounds like "I like to use that chair, so I point to a table".
Bidirectional link is a Link (I see it as inheritance) so for pointing I think I can use Link element (but if it breaks a rule I can use BidirectionalLink for that, no problem)
I've just realised that it was too object-oriented. Let have this one: <nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/isAlias"> <nml:BidirectionalLink idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation> </nml:Link> Roman
Roman
I guess that's not what you meant. :)
Freek
_______________________________________________ nml-wg mailing list nml-wg@ogf.org https://www.ogf.org/mailman/listinfo/nml-wg