On 21-08-2012 15:14, Roman Łapacz wrote:
I've analysed the list of relations in artf6547 and it seems that the following snippet (taken from the example file I recommended in my previous email) is wrong:
<nml:Link id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:B-to-C"> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/relation/hasSource"> <nml:Port idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:B:port_ge-1.0.8.1501-out"/> </nml:Relation> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/relation/hasSink"> <nml:Port idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:C:port_ge-5.2.7.1501-in"/> </nml:Relation> </nml:Link>
It uses hasSource/hasSink relations but according to the list only isSource/isSink are permitted. So the structure should be transformed into:
<nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:B:port_ge-1.0.8.1501-out"> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/relation/isSource"> <nml:Link idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:B-to-C"/> </nml:Relation> </nml:Port>
<nml:Port id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:C:port_ge-5.2.7.1501-in"> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/10/relation/isSink"> <nml:Link idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:B-to-C"/> </nml:Relation> </nml:Port>
<nml:Link idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:B-to-C"> </nml:Link>
Am I right?
Yes, this is correct. Freek