Jason Zurawski wrote:
Hi Roman;
Jason Zurawski wrote:
Hi Roman;
This section is describing the topology service produced in perfSONAR-PS (info here: http://www.internet2.edu/performance/pS-PS/topology.html), which is similar to an LS in operation but operates on the topology schema elements.
OK. This may be a bit misleading if someone knows general concept of pS infrastructure, not certain implementation (in this case ps-pS).
This is a part of the perfSONAR infrastructure, the component has been described in the original architecture documents and the existence of this service is not new (was developed in conjunction with DICE control plane activities).
Are you seeing this as misleading because there is not an MDM implementation that matches functionality? There are several services that are in MDM that are not in pSPS and vice versa, the common thread being they are all 'perfSONAR' since they speak the protocols.
I'm not comparing the implementations. I wasn't aware that TS can have register functionality like LS. Roman
Thanks;
-jason
Roman
Thanks;
-jason
Hi,
to me the text about Topology Service (TS) in section 3 describes Lookup Service (LS), not TS (Jason, Martin, what do you think?). I remember it was discussed somewhere that TS may use LS to get registered topology data but still LS is not TS in the general concept of pS.
regards, Roman
Freek Dijkstra wrote:
All,
Our first deliverable, "Network topology descriptions in hybrid networks", is now soliciting public comments. If you have any comments, or know anyone who like to comment on this document, please do so at http://www.ogf.org/gf/docs/comment.php?id=327. The official public comment period ends Feb 15, 2010.
My apologies to Paola Grosso for the very long delay (over a year) between the final editing and this public comments. This was mostly due to negligence and unfamiliarity of procedures on my part.
With kind regards, Freek Dijkstra