W dniu 2012-07-11 15:33, Freek Dijkstra pisze:
On 11-07-2012 15:26, Freek Dijkstra wrote:
On 11-07-2012 15:16, Roman Łapacz wrote:
<!-- COMMENT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --> <!-- I propose to use new Relation="representedBy" --> <!--- when an object (in this case a Link can be represented by an other. Definition of them is the same! -->
<nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation type"http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/representedBy"> <nml:Link id="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation> </nml:Link>
Hold on, did you mean to write:
<nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/representedBy"> <nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation> </nml:Link>
Yes, but I understand that I can use Link instead of BidirectionalLink while pointing to BidirectionalLink. in fact I should have used IdRef <nml:BidirectionalLink id="urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation type="http://schemas.ogf.org/nml/2012/07/relation/representedBy"> <nml:Link idRef="urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:domainx-domainy-domainx"> <nml:Relation> Roman
?
That would make more sense to me, and is probably the same as the "isAlias" relation.
Freek