10 Jul
2012
10 Jul
'12
2:51 p.m.
W dniu 2012-07-10 14:17, Freek Dijkstra pisze: >>> Links >>> ----- >>> >>> You never seem to connect any of the urn:ogf:network:domainx.net:2012:* >>> identifiers to any of the urn:ogf:network:domainy.net:2012:* identifiers. >>> >>> How do you describe that domains X and Y are connected to each other? I >>> may have overlooked it (If I stare too much at XML and I'm bound to miss >>> the obvious). >> I didn't want to use links in this first example. Links will be >> presented in the next one. >> This example presents a simple topology that focus only on >> configurations in network devices. Use of ports and port groups are >> sufficient for some use cases (an example is the NSI topology).. > I can think of two ways to related domains together: > * Using Links between the Nodes in a Topology I tried to relate domains using Links between Ports but that does not look good to me (see the attachment). If I have bidirectional ports a link between does not have to be bidirectional. But to connect them I use sink/source structure that indicates direction (source->sink). Is there a solution for that already discussed? Roman > * Using aliases to relate an outbound Ports of one Topology with > the inbound Port of another Topology. > NSI preferred (well, Jeroen and I told them they preferred ;) ) the > second option. In your example you did neither. This is fine, but in > that case you are describing that domainx is connected to domainy. > > Freek